Cited by 22Themes in Literature AnalysisLiteracy and Educational PracticesEducational Philosophies and Pedagogies

Different fiction genres take children’s memories to different places

Open access
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Cremin, Teresa·2022·Cambridge Journal of Education

Abstract

Fiction, more than expository text, nurtures intimate connections between text and the reader’s life experiences. This dimension of reader response is underexplored in relation to children. Adapting methods from Empirical Literary Studies to educational research objectives, the authors employed the concept of ‘remindings’, i.e. reminiscing prompted by text, in studying children’s life-resonant responses to self-selected leisure books. Six workshops were run in primary classrooms during which participants (N = 148; age 8–11) engaged in remindings and mental imagery. Written remindings were then analysed for systematic variation across fiction book genres (Real-world vs. Fantasy; Relationships vs. Adventure). They found that Real-World Adventure books prompted remindings of discrete life events, while Real-World Relationships books prompted remindings of more diffuse experiences. Fantasy Adventure books were the least likely to prompt remindings. Further genre-based differences emerged in the distribution of themes within remindings. The authors consider the consequences of these insights for supporting young readers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0305764x.2021.1937523

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiction genres more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers' empathy.

    “Indeed, fiction genres that are more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters ' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers ' empathy, as they allow readers to explore characters from within (Cupchik and László, 1994; Kuzmi č ová and Cremin, 2022; László and Cupchik, 1995).”

    From Reading and Empathy: Qualitative insights into adolescents' experiences with fiction books (2025) · cites this paper as Kuzmičová and Cremin, 2022

    The ‘Different genres of fiction’ section reports that Relationships fiction is associated with greater empathy development than Adventure fiction, plausibly because it portrays subtler social emotions. The Conclusion says Real-world Relationships books prompted reflection on children’s social and emotional experiences, but the paper does not establish that real-life or contemporary settings themselves increase empathy. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fiction books provide safe spaces for adolescents to work through negative or difficult emotions (personal growth) or empathize with characters (connection).

    “as fiction books provide safe spaces for adolescents to work through negative or difficult emotions (personal growth) or empathize with characters (connection).”

    From How Does Reading Fiction Support Adolescents’ Wellbeing? A Qualitative Study Examining Positive Affect, Connection and Personal Growth (2025) · cites this paper as Kuzmičová & Cremin, 2022

    The ‘Different genres of fiction’ section says fiction can let readers simulate life situations without real-world consequences and reports an association between relationship-focused fiction and empathy development. The study itself concerns children aged 8–11, not adolescents, and its Discussion reports memories of adversity rather than showing that readers work through difficult emotions or achieve personal growth. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.
  2. Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2002). Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts. London: Routledge.
  3. Charlton, M., et al. (2004). Reading strategies in everyday life: Different ways of reading a novel which make a distinction. Poetics Today, 25(2), 241-263.
  4. Cupchik, G. C., & László, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8(4), 297-312.
  5. Denis, M. (1982). Imaging while reading text: A study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 540-545.
  6. Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Cultural Psychology, 20(1), 31-48.
  7. Halász, L. (1991). Emotional effect and reminding in literary processing. Poetics, 20(3), 247-272.
  8. Hempel-Jorgensen, A., Cremin, T., Harris, D., & Chamberlain, L. (2018). Pedagogy for reading for pleasure in low socio-economic primary schools: Beyond 'pedagogy of poverty'? Literacy, 52(2), 86-94.
  9. Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Cremin, T. (2017). Young children's reading for pleasure with digital books: Six key facets of engagement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 67-84.
  10. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171-203.
  11. Kuzmičová, A. (2014). Literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275-293.
  12. Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C. (2017). Literature and readers' empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137-152.
  13. Mackey, M. (2019a). Visualization and the vivid reading experience. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 11(1), 38-58.
  14. Mackey, M. (2019b). Placing readers: Diverse routes to the cognitive challenge of fictional world-building. Children's Literature Association Quarterly, 44(4), 415-431.
  15. Magyari, L., Mangen, A., Kuzmičová, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts in different narrative styles. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13. doi:10.16910/jemr.13.3.3 · DOI
  16. Moses, L., & Kelly, L. B. (2018). 'We're a little loud. That's because we like to read!': Developing positive views of reading in a diverse, urban first grade. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18 (3), 307-337.
  17. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  18. Seilman, U., & Larsen, S. F. (1989). Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading. Poetics, 18(1-2), 165-177.
  19. Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers' experience of Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258-268.
  20. Therman, C. (2008). Remindings, understanding and involvement: A close reading of the content and context of remindings. In J. Auracher & W. van Peer (Eds.), New beginnings in literary studies (pp. 352-371). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  21. Thornton, A. (Ed.). (2018). The National Curriculum and the Teachers' Standards: The complete programme of study for Key Stages 1-3 & the Teachers' Standards in full. London: Learning Matters.
  22. Torr, J. (2007). The pleasure of recognition: Intertextuality in the talk of preschoolers during shared reading with mothers and teachers. Early Years, 27(1), 77-91.

Authors
Kuzmičová, A., & Cremin, T.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kuzmičová, Anežka
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Education
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
37-53
ISSN
  • 0305-764X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3577
OpenAlex
W3178837324
Cited by
22
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
FWCI
36.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Charles University (PRIMUS/20/HUM/005)
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Telovýchovy (8F18003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Keywords
children's reading, fiction genres, reader response, reminiscence, life events, mental imagery, fantasy fiction, adventure fiction, self-selected reading, elementary school students, young readers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review