The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The land question: special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India
Open accessAbstract
Special Economic Zones (SEZs) have become the epicenters of ‘land wars’ across India, with farmers resisting the state's forcible transfer of their land to capitalists. Based on 18 months of research focused on an SEZ in Rajasthan, this paper illuminates the role of ‘accumulation by dispossession’ (ABD) in Indian capitalism today and its consequences for rural India. It argues that the existing theories of land grabs do not adequately explain why dispossession becomes necessary to accumulation at particular times and places, and seeks to reconstruct Harvey's theory of ABD to adequately account for it. It then shows the specific kind of rentier- and IT-driven accumulation that dispossession is making possible in SEZs and the non–labor-absorbing, real-estate–driven agrarian transformation this generates in the surrounding countryside. Land speculation amplifies class and caste inequalities in novel ways, marginalizes women and creates an involutionary dynamic of agrarian change that is ultimately impoverishing for the rural poor. Given the minimal benefits for rural India in this model of development, farmer resistance to land dispossession is likely to continue and pose the most serious obstacle to capitalist growth in India. The agrarian questions of labor and capital are, consequently, now rejoined in ‘the land question.’
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural Involution: The Processes of Ecological Change in Indonesia
Geertz, C. (1963) · doi:10.1525/9780520341821 · Cited by 1,297
“What Is, and What Is Not, Imperialism?”
Brenner, R. (2006) · Historical Materialism · doi:10.1163/156920606778982464 · Cited by 146 · cited 1×
“But if ABD is defined as whatever provides an outlet for over-accumulated capital, it is no longer clear what separates it from other ‘spatio-temporal fixes’ and the ordinary operation of capitalist expansion (Brenner 2006).”
BackgroundHarvey, D. (2006) · Historical Materialism · doi:10.1163/156920606778982563 · Cited by 46
Cited by
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Theft Is Property!: Dispossession and Critical Theory
Nichols, R. (2020) · doi:10.1215/9781478090250 · Cited by 41
‘Fluid Dispossessions’: Contested Waters in Capitalist Natures
Dewan, C., & Nustad, K. G. (2024) · Ethnos · doi:10.1080/00141844.2023.2214340 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Levien, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-05-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 933-969
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2062640362
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 41.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The land question: special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2012.656268
- The paper
- Levien, M. (2012). The land question: special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.656268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.