The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for?
Abstract
Leading international organisations presently argue that a transition to ‘climate-smart agriculture’ (CSA) is an obligatory task to ensure food supply for an anticipated nine billion people by 2050. Despite the rubric’s newfound importance, the conceptual underpinnings of CSA are often left unclear. Focusing on the World Bank’s framework, this paper critically interrogates the principles and concepts that underpin CSA. It argues that while CSA provides greater policy space for more holistic approaches to agriculture, it nonetheless operates within an apolitical framework that is narrowly focused on technical fixes at the level of production. This depoliticised approach to the global food system tends to validate existing policy agendas and minimise questions concerning power, inequality and access. By highlighting four strong tensions that permeate the CSA framework, the paper extols the need to greatly widen the scope of debate. To this end, it proposes an alternative ‘climate-wise’ framework to foreground the inherently political dimensions of food and agriculture in an era of climatic change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological intensification of agriculture — sustainable by nature
Tittonell, P. (2014) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006 · Cited by 770
Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes
Jackson, L. E., Pascual, U., & Hodgkin, T. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017 · Cited by 560
Cited by
Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers
Stringer, L. C., Fraser, E. D. G., Harris, D., Lyon, C., Pereira, L., Ward, C. F. M., & Simelton, E. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007 · Cited by 325
Abegunde, V. O., Sibanda, M., & Obi, A. (2019) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli7110132 · Cited by 293
Franco, J. C., & Borras, S. M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.013 · Cited by 150
Risky returns: The implications of financialization in the food system
Clapp, J., & Isakson, S. R. (2018) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12376 · Cited by 149
Jia, F., Shahzadi, G., Bourlakis, M., & John, A. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140364 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-05-25
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-107
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2620475968
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2017.1312355
- The paper
- Taylor, M. (2018). Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for? The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1312355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.