Cited by 42Analytical chemistry methods developmentElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsExtraction and Separation Processes

Development of an air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction method based on a ternary solidified deep eutectic solvent in extraction and preconcentration of Cd(II) and Zn(II) ions

Sorouraddin, Saeed Mohammad, Farajzadeh, Mir Ali, Dastoori, Hossein, Okhravi, Tohid·2021·International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

A green, simple, rapid, and efficient ligandless air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction procedure based on solidification of a ternary deep eutectic solvent was developed for the extraction of trace amounts of cadmium(II) and zinc(II) ions in aqueous samples prior to their determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. For this purpose, the deep eutectic solvent is formed by mixing sorbitol, menthol, and mandelic acid at a suitable mole ratio and after heating for a short time, a deep eutectic solvent with low density compared to water is synthesised. The synthesised solvent is used as a chelating agent and also as an extraction solvent. Under the optimum experimental conditions, the linear ranges were obtained in the ranges of 0.5–12.5 and 0.5–10.0 µg L−1 for Zn(II) and Cd(II), respectively. The relative standard deviations (n = 6, C = 2.5 µg L−1 of each cation) were 4.2% and 3.4%, for Cd(II) and Zn(II), respectively. Moreover, the obtained detection limits were 0.15 and 0.12 µg L−1 for Cd(II) and Zn(II), respectively. The accuracy of the developed method was studied by analysing SPS-WW2 Batch 108 water as a certified reference material. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied in the determination of Cd(II) and Zn(II) ions in water and fruit juice samples.Abbreviations: AALLME: Air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction; ER: Extraction recovery; FAAS: Flame atomic absorption spectrometry; LOD: Limit of detection; LOQ: Limit of quantification; RSD: Relative standard deviation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03067319.2019.1686144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 42

Authors
Sorouraddin, S. M., Farajzadeh, M. A., Dastoori, H., & Okhravi, T.
Affiliations
University of Tabriz (IR)
Corresponding author
Sorouraddin, Saeed Mohammad
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
101
Issue
11
Pages
1567-1580
ISSN
  • 0306-7319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0397
OpenAlex
W2985583823
Cited by
42
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction, cadmium, zinc, trace metal preconcentration, sorbitol, menthol, mandelic acid, chelating agents, flame atomic absorption spectrometry, fruit juice analysis, water analysis, green analytical chemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review