Cited by 34Heavy metals in environmentAnalytical chemistry methods developmentHeavy Metals in Plants

Assessment of potentially toxic elements in vegetables and soil samples irrigated with treated sewage and human health risk assessment

Ahmadi-Jouibari, Toraj, Ahmadi Jouybari, Hadi, Sharafi, Kiomars, Heydari, Mahtab, Fattahi, Nazir·2023·International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

In this work, a new microextraction approach termed as vortex-assisted liquid phase microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent (VALPME-DES) combined with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) has been developed for the extraction, preconcentration and determination of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in vegetables and soil samples irrigated with treated sewage from two different regions of Iran. The new DES was prepared by mixing a 1:1 molar ratio of choline chloride and citric acid monohydrate. Some effective parameters on extraction were studied and optimised. Under the optimum conditions, the repeatability and reproducibility of the VALPME-DES coupled with ETAAS for 5.0 µg L−1 of As(III) and 0.50 µg L−1 of Pb and Cd were determined to be 2.7–4.3 and 3.8–6.2%, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curves was in the range of 0.995–0.998. The limit of detections was in the range of 0.03 and 0.1 µg kg−1 for different metal ions. Linear range of 0.3 − 100 µg kg−1 for As(III) and, 0.03–200 µg kg−1 for Cd and Pb were obtained. The results showed among the target metals, the highest impact on the total value of non-carcinogenic risk was related to arsenic. Furthermore, the non-carcinogenic risk value for all vegetable types was lower than the permitted level. We also found that the risk of arsenic carcinogenicity was higher than the acceptable levels in all four types of vegetables. According to the findings, interventions to reduce arsenic should be used, especially in cultivated soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03067319.2021.1893704

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 34

Authors
Ahmadi-Jouibari, T., Ahmadi Jouybari, H., Sharafi, K., Heydari, M., & Fattahi, N.
Affiliations
  • Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Fattahi, Nazir
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Published
2021-03-10
Volume
103
Issue
10
Pages
2351-2367
ISSN
  • 0306-7319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0397
OpenAlex
W3135751790
Cited by
34
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
Keywords
potentially toxic elements, vegetables, soil contamination, arsenic, lead, cadmium, deep eutectic solvents, choline chloride, non-carcinogenic risk, cancer risk, human health risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review