Assessment of potentially toxic elements in vegetables and soil samples irrigated with treated sewage and human health risk assessment
Abstract
In this work, a new microextraction approach termed as vortex-assisted liquid phase microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent (VALPME-DES) combined with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) has been developed for the extraction, preconcentration and determination of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in vegetables and soil samples irrigated with treated sewage from two different regions of Iran. The new DES was prepared by mixing a 1:1 molar ratio of choline chloride and citric acid monohydrate. Some effective parameters on extraction were studied and optimised. Under the optimum conditions, the repeatability and reproducibility of the VALPME-DES coupled with ETAAS for 5.0 µg L−1 of As(III) and 0.50 µg L−1 of Pb and Cd were determined to be 2.7–4.3 and 3.8–6.2%, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curves was in the range of 0.995–0.998. The limit of detections was in the range of 0.03 and 0.1 µg kg−1 for different metal ions. Linear range of 0.3 − 100 µg kg−1 for As(III) and, 0.03–200 µg kg−1 for Cd and Pb were obtained. The results showed among the target metals, the highest impact on the total value of non-carcinogenic risk was related to arsenic. Furthermore, the non-carcinogenic risk value for all vegetable types was lower than the permitted level. We also found that the risk of arsenic carcinogenicity was higher than the acceptable levels in all four types of vegetables. According to the findings, interventions to reduce arsenic should be used, especially in cultivated soils.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DES-DLLME-SFOD was also applied for the extraction of Pb, Cd, Cu, As, and Hg from tea [76], Cr (VI) from urine samples [81], and nickel and cobalt from food and water [55].
“DES-DLLME-SFOD was also applied for the extraction of Pb, Cd, Cu, As, and Hg from tea [76], Cr (VI) from urine samples [81], and nickel and cobalt from food and water [55].”
Arsenic and selenium are metalloids that have been extracted using DLLME-SFOD [76][77][78][79].
“Arsenic and selenium are metalloids that have been extracted using DLLME-SFOD [76][77][78][79].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Ahmadi-Jouibari, T., Ahmadi Jouybari, H., Sharafi, K., Heydari, M., & Fattahi, N.
- Affiliations
- Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fattahi, Nazir
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-10
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2351-2367
- ISSN
- 0306-7319 (ISSN-L)
- 1029-0397
- OpenAlex
- W3135751790
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Keywords
- potentially toxic elements, vegetables, soil contamination, arsenic, lead, cadmium, deep eutectic solvents, choline chloride, non-carcinogenic risk, cancer risk, human health risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review