The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Significant conversations and significant networks – exploring the backstage of the teaching arena
Abstract
This article presents an inquiry into conversations that academic teachers have about teaching. The authors investigated to whom they talk and the forms that these conversations take. The findings indicate that most teachers rely on a small number of significant others for conversations that are characterised by their privacy, by mutual trust and by their intellectual intrigue. Individual teachers seem to have small ‘significant networks’, where private discussions provide a basis for conceptual development and learning, quite different from the ‘front stage’ of formal, public debate about teaching. Individual teachers seem to have more significant conversations and larger networks where the local culture is perceived to be supportive of such conversations. The findings are interpreted in relation to socio‐cultural theories, and have clear implications for the development of teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developing a quality culture through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.536972 · Cited by 132
Self-citationCredibility in educational development: trustworthiness, expertise, and identification
Little, D., & Green, D. A. (2022) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1871325 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-22
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-559
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2144399202
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.