Cited by 140Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsInnovative Education and Learning PracticesPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’

Barnacle, Robyn, Mewburn, Inger·2010·Studies in Higher Education

Abstract

Scholars such as Kamler and Thompson argue that identity formation has a key role to play in doctoral learning, particularly the process of thesis writing. This article builds on these insights to address other sites in which scholarly identity is performed within doctoral candidature. Drawing on actor‐network theory, the authors examine the role of material things, what Latour calls ‘the missing masses’, in the process of ‘becoming doctor’, with the aim of unpacking the implications of this for doctoral learning and the journey of becoming a researcher or scholar. Through this approach the authors demonstrate that scholarly identity is distributed and comes to be performed through both traditional and non‐traditional sites of learning. The article concludes by addressing the implications of this for efforts to support candidates in the process of becoming researchers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03075070903131214

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Barnacle, Robyn
Venue
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2010-06
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
433-444
ISSN
  • 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-174X
OpenAlex
W2142216299
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
doctoral candidature, academic identity, identity construction, becoming a researcher, learning networks, actor-network theory, missing mass, thesis writing, decentralized identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review