The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning?
Abstract
This article reports the findings of research into the student experience of assessment in school/college and higher education, and the impact of transition upon student perceptions of feedback quality. It involved a qualitative study of 23 staff and 145 students in six schools/colleges and three English universities across three disciplines. Results show that students experience a radically different culture of feedback in schools/colleges and higher education, with the former providing extensive formative feedback and guidance, while the latter focuses upon independent learning judged summatively. Students perceived quality feedback as part of a dialogic guidance process rather than a summative event. A model is proposed, the Dialogic Feedback Cycle, to describe student experiences at school/college, and suggestions are made as to how it can be used as a tool to scaffold the development of independent learning throughout the first year of university study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reconceptualizing feedback as a two-way conversation has led to a greater emphasis on the learner's active participation in receiving and acting upon feedback. 27-30”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1×
“However, whilst seminal research has been conducted on the assessment experience of students in schools (Black and Wiliam 1998 ; Black et al.”
BackgroundTeaching For Quality Learning At University
BIGGS, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (1999) · Cited by 7,559
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Teaching for quality learning at university
Boulton‐Lewis, G. M. (2008) · Faculty of Education · Cited by 4,926
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
(2003) · Cited by 1,586
Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications
Collins, N. (2009) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2009.11779027 · Cited by 1,444
Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005) · Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) · Cited by 1,265
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 1999, Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box
- Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M. O. and Shannon, L. Reconceptualising assessment. Paper presented at the 2nd International Pedagogical Research in Higher Education (PRHE) Conference. June16–17. UK: at the Liverpool Hope University.
- Boud D., 2007, Rethinking assessment in higher education, 3, 10.4324/9780203964309 · DOI · Paper page
- Burgess R., 2007, Beyond the honours degree classification: The Burgess Group final report
- 2008, Assessment for learning strategy
- Gibbs G., 2002, Exchange, 3
- Hattie J. A., 1987, International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 187
- Hounsell D., 2003, Higher education and the lifecourse, 67
- Hounsell, D. Enhancing learning and teaching: What role can research evidence play? Paper presented to Queen’s First Annual Conference of the Centre for Educational Development, Queen’s University. September18–19, Belfast.
- Hounsell D., 2007, Rethinking assessment in higher education, 101
- Murphy R., 2006, Innovative assessment in higher education, 37
- Nicol D. J., 2004, Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback, 3
- Price M., 2008, Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–290 of 290
Memory and relationships: A look into teachers' recollection of supervisory feedback
Clark‐Gareca, B., & Warkentin, T. B. (2024) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.823 · Cited by 2
An Exploration of Dialogue to Promote Assessment Feedback Literacy
Akponah, P. O., Hassen, H., & Higgins, M. (2024) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.21 · Cited by 2
“…understanding of feedback’s purposes (Carless 2016), integrating them into their learning practices, while tutors reciprocate by better comprehending students’ learning needs, preferences, an d challenges, allowing for more targeted and tailored feedback (Beaumont, O’Doherty, and Shannon 2011).”
BackgroundSTUDYING THE MATH SELF-LEARNING CAPACITY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
Van, Q. N. (2020) · Journal of Science Educational Science · doi:10.18173/2354-1075.2020-0120 · Cited by 2
Curriculum and assessment leadership for learning
TAN, K. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315760889-10 · Cited by 2
Advice for Action with Automatic Feedback Systems
Whitelock, D. M. (2018) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68318-8_7 · Cited by 2
Faculty Perceptions Regarding Best Practices in Clinical Dental Hygiene Assessment
Walstead, B. K. (2015) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 2
Feedback mit Learning Analytics – Interdisziplinäres Design eines Dashboards für Studierende
van Rijn, L., Karolyi, H., Hanses, M., & de Witt, C. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung · doi:10.21240/zfhe/19-4/05 · Cited by 1
Liu, W.-F., & Lu, L. (2025) · International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews · doi:10.60027/ijsasr.2025.5828 · Cited by 1
“The model of the Dialogic Feedback Cycle frames three stages: preparatory guidance (analysis of task requirement and quality standards), in-task guidance (teacher and peer feedback on problem-solving), and performance feedback (teacher feedback on final performance) (Beaumont et al., 2011).”
Deng, M. T., Xin, W., & Yang, M. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2504617 · Cited by 1
“This methodological trend may reflect a prevailing research focus on evaluating the efficacy of different digital assessment tools (e.g. Beaumont, O’Doherty, and Shannon 2011; Dawson et al. 2019).”
Feedback literacy and student engagement with WCF by beginner JFL learners: a classroom study
Takahashi, J. (2025) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2023-0144 · Cited by 2
Ogbozor, E., Lopez, K., Happel, C. C., Klonggumrai, D., & Brown, J. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2581349 · Cited by 2
“As Beaumont and colleagues suggest, quality feedback is ‘ part of a dialogic guidance process rather than a summative event ’ (Beaumont et al., 2011, p. 671); a process in which fairness, responsiveness, and transparency play a critical role in shaping the student-instructor dynamic.”
Introducing a Structured Format for Learner Self-assessment: The Tutor’s Perspective
Jacobs, C., Winnard, Y., & Elliott, V. (2015) · European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning · doi:10.2478/eurodl-2014-0026 · Cited by 1
“Students are asked to identify and query any feedback that is unclear to them and actively encouraged to follow up the return of a completed draft work form by arranging a tutorial (Nicol & MacFarlane-Dick, 2006; Beaumont et al., 2011).”
Background"How many legs does a dog have?" - Continuous online assessment in the Life Sciences
Alston, P. (2015) · Cited by 1
Gartland, K. M. A., Shapiro, A., McAleavy, L., McDermott, J., Nimmo, A., & Armstrong, M. (2016) · New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences · doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i11.548 · Cited by 1
“The Feedback Enhancement Group worked together to design ways to enhance student feedback and future learning through a dialogic approach (Beaumont et al., 2011) across a 13,241 fulltime equivalent student university with campuses in Glasgow and London (GCU, 2015).”
MethodGiralt, E. G., & Varela, J. L. M. (2017) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2017.156.58289 · Cited by 1
Wood, C., & Jones, G. W. (2020) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2020.1846314 · Cited by 1
DISRUPTIVE TIMES AND HIGHER EDUCATION IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT: IMPORTANCE OF DUAL ASSESSMENT
Hanžek, M., Biočina, Z., Martinović, M., & Pirić, V. (2021) · International Scientific Conference EMAN. Economics & Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times · doi:10.31410/eman.2021.215 · Cited by 1
Saumya (2022) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2022.2159939 · Cited by 1
“The lack of gauged feedback can prove unfruitful (Beaumont et al., 2011) while calculated, well-timed feedback can turn out to be valuable to and source crucial dialogs (Hısmanoglu & Hısmanoglu, 2009) both for the educators as well as the students.”
BackgroundRazali, R. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v12-i1/15729 · Cited by 1
Muñoz, D. R., & Araya, D. H. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782023280123 · Cited by 16
Mustaffa, M. F., Suratman, S., Ali, A. A., Latip, N. A., Halim, H., Ramli, S., Mahamood, M., & Hasan, M. H. (2021) · Borneo AKademika · doi:10.24191/ba/v5i2/82292 · Cited by 1
10. Not Just a Hashtag: Using Black Twitter to Engage in Critical Visual Pedagogy
Knowles-Davis, M. L., & Moore, R. L. (2023) · Athabasca University Press eBooks · doi:10.15215/aupress/9781778290015.011 · Cited by 1
Moreno, G. A., & Pujols, M. D. C. (2025) · Cadernos de Tradução · doi:10.5007/2175-7968.2025.e100544 · Cited by 1
“…reported here referred to the need for dialogue and exchange with the teacher, a point that is fully in keeping with other studies that conceptualise feedback as a form of communicative exchange between participants in an ongoing process (see, for example, Nicol, 2010, or Beaumont et al ., 2011).”
Qualitative Feedback Comparison Between Professors and AI in STEM Education
Navarro, L. V., Pérez, M. M. G., Barajas-Álvarez, P., Ortiz-Zavala, E., Reyes‐Villegas, E., & Sánchez-Lizárraga, J. M. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016507 · Cited by 1
“However, research shows that students often report dissatisfaction with the feedback they receive [4, 5].”
Perry, S. C. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00835-6 · Cited by 1
Questions for Assessment: A Guide for Tutors’ Practice and Student Development
McKevitt, C. (2015) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.21427/d72m82 · Cited by 1
Aoun, C., Ang, K., & Vatanasakdakul, S. (2014) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1
Olivier, J. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.02 · Cited by 1
Developing Feedback Literacy in Emirati Undergraduates
Myers, T., & Buchanan, J. (2022) · English language teaching · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8888-1_20 · Cited by 1
Farid, S., Kanwal, W., Ameer, S., & Karim, T. (2021) · Journal of Management Practices Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.33152/jmphss-5.6.6 · Cited by 1
“• To explore inluence of Prompt teacher feedback on student achievement at secondary level.”
InfluentialAlkhodair, S. A. (2023) · International Conference on Education and Education of Social Sciences (INTCESS) · doi:10.51508/intcess.202309 · Cited by 1
Soden, W. (2013) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 1
The relation between high-school students’ performance and feedback memory
Schwartz, D. L., & Cutumisu, M. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r36w96p5z · Cited by 1
Finch, M. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.204113 · Cited by 1
Feedback on Academic Essay Writing through pre-Emptive Hints: Moving Towards "Advice for Action"
Whitelock, D. M., Twiner, A., Richardson, J. T. E., Field, D., & Pulman, S. (2015) · Open Research Online (The Open University)
Cookson, C. J. (2026) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · doi:10.82444/warw.33696664
Högskolepedagogik och examination : universitetsläraruppdragets Janusansikte?
Johansson, M. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
“Feedback was very helpful”: the benefits of feedback on drafts for students learning.
Burke, D. (2014) · Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religion (JBASR) · doi:10.18792/diskus.v14i0.18
Morton, L., Johnson, A. L., Williams, A. P., & Northcote, M. T. (2015)
eGrids, a Catalyst for Improved Learning?
Dean, M. (2014) · International Journal for Digital Society · doi:10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2014.0109
“Beaumont et al [1] identify a number of points related to a potential fault line in student experience of feedback between College and University.”
BackgroundInfluentialCroney, P. (2016) · Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)
Assessment for learning: supervisory feedback practice in higher education
Talib, R., Supie, H. S. M., Kamsah, M. Z., Naim, H. A., & Yusof, S. M. (2016) · Man in India
Using Feedback Strategies to Support First-Year Students’ Independent Learning and Critical Judgment
Lee, T. T. H., & Yang, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_19
Chesterman, M. (2015) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)
Bavin, R., & McAteer, K. (2017) · IISES International Academic Conference · doi:10.20472/iac.2017.028.002
Formative assessment in HE : feedback practices from UTM postgraduate students’ perspective
Talib, R., Naim, H. A., & Supie, H. S. M. (2014)
Ngcobo, M. W., & Shawa, L. B. (2015) · International Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.1080/09751122.2015.11890304
“Beaumont et al. (2011) further found that 95 percent of students wanted immediate feedback; as such, timing is crucial to providing meaningful feedback.”
BackgroundInfluentialWallis, R. (2017) · University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton)
Feedback in Masters Courses and the Development of International Students’ Academic Literacy
Solano, V. G. (2018) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00180
Students’ sense making of feedback. Dialogue, interaction and emotions
Steen-Utheim, A. T. (2019) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Focusing Effective Feedback Practices on Developing Students' ‘Assessment Literacy'
Ladbrook, D. E. (2020) · Advances in early childhood and K-12 education · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2901-0.ch005
Devising an overall strategy for providing feedback
Cooper, S. A., & Krishnan, S. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429282218-5
Feed forward - information for students
Gordon, C. (2019) · UWL Repository (University of West London)
Tales on Soles: driving design via Design Activism
Subasinghe, C. T. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1962272
“Variety is the spice Variety in assessment formats was designed to address students who tend to react to human-to-human feedback and sta ff who preferred to calibrate their feedback before formalisation (Beaumont, O ’ Doherty, and Shannon 2011).”
BackgroundEnhancing Student Assessment Through Veedback
Sabbaghan, S. (2017) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.11575/prism/5333
Kamanga, E. H., Beer, J. J. D., & Lubbe, A. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.10
Mentz, E., & Lubbe, A. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.0p
FEEDBACK STRATEGIES FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACULTY
(2018) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/2_iis_2018_23-32
Developing Students’ Feedback and Assessment Literacy in Higher Education
Beaumont, C. D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_17-1
Wilder, K. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1435384
Dąbrowska, M., & Dąbrowska, I. (2022) · Rozprawy Społeczne · doi:10.29316/rs/147668
Ünal, N. Ü., Karal, M. A., & Tan, S. (2022) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1052406
Carter, R., Ramjan, L. M., Wilson, N. J., Glew, P. J., Salamonson, Y., & Halcomb, E. (2023) · Teaching and learning in nursing · doi:10.1016/j.teln.2023.01.003
Implementing UDL in a University Setting
Smidt, A., Stanford, T., Kminiak, D., Montague, I., & Buhne, J. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7370-2.ch003
What feedback do students expect for effective learning?
Storai, F., & Salvadori, I. (2023) · EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY · doi:10.3280/ess1-2023oa15286
การพฒนาเครองมอวดและโปรไฟลการใหขอมลปอนกลบแบบชทศสำหรบสงเสรมกระบวนการเรยนรเพอการเปลยนแปลงของนสตบณฑตศกษา
ประจันบาน, ณ., แกมเกตุ, ว., & ภิรมย์สมบัติ, ช. (2018) · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2018.1169
Lavadia, C. J. G. (2022) · International Journal of Research Publications · doi:10.47119/ijrp1001041720223519
Liu, G., & Jingxi, L. I. A. O. (2024) · Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala · doi:10.33788/rcis.85.2
“Today, many universities and colleges in many countries have adopted a large number of new theory and techniques to support the development of higher education (Beaumont et al., 2011).”
BackgroundEvolving Roles of Post-Pandemic EFL Teachers and Students: Student Learning and Assessment
AKÇAYOĞLU, D. İ., & Özer, Ö. (2024) · Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.31464/jlere.1472710
C‐Scott, M., & McLaughlin, P. A. (2024) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-7471-5_7
Peer Assessment: A Powerful Way to Cultivate Student Assessment Literacy
Yang, M., Yan, Z., Yang, L., & Zhan, Y. (2025) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9484-3_4
Research and Analysis on Process Assessment of Compulsory Courses in Universities
Li, T., Li, Y., & Li, Z. (2025) · OALib · doi:10.4236/oalib.1113335
Unravelling Students’ Untold Stories on Teachers’ Feedbacking in the Classroom
Villanueva, L., & Abelito, J. T. (2025) · Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.380606
Milovanovic, M., Ekström, A. M., & Pärssinen, J. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2558220 · Cited by 1
“Beaumont et al. (2011) describe feedback as a dialogic cycle, supporting continuous learning and future planning.”
Bakken, J. P., & Estes, T. S. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-618-620251010
Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14927153
Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14927156
Walking a Tightrope: Using Formative Feedback to Support Independent and Self-Directed Learning
Rajah, E., Hewage, W., & Imbulpitiya, A. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83549-958-020251006
TATL—360° Assessment for Teaching and Learning: A Case Study in Digital Electronics Lab
Daibes, J. V. D., & Zanghi, R. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2026.3658034
“It is undeniable that the feedback process can be conceptualized as a communicative event [7] where both the sender and receiver of the message are usually assigned a symmetrical level of responsibility so that e ff ective transmission occurs [1].”
Cross-Cultural PhD Supervision in Norway: A Reflective Case Study
Cheynet, E., Wan, Y., & Dikilitaş, K. (2026) · Norsk tidsskrift for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.15845/norsotl.v1.4703
“In other words, we include a dialogic dimension to feedback, which can promote independent learning (Beaumont et al., 2011).”
Clarifying the unseen: Assessment workload and time expectations for students in higher education
Kramer, A., Hsiao, Y. P., & Stienstra, M. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70170
Jacob, P. K. V. (2026) · Acta Pedagogia Asiana · doi:10.53623/apga.v5i2.1187
“Through continuous observation and evaluation, teachers are able to determine whether students are achieving intended learning outcomes and identify misconceptions or learning gaps early in the instructional process [54].”
Qi, Y., Sun, D., & Zhan, Y. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2693957
Faith, L., & Reid, S. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1007/s42330-026-00510-4
“In secondary school, an urgent focus on curriculum often leaves little time for developing self-regulated learning skills (Beaumont et al., 2011); most students feel as though the study habits they apply in university have little connection to their preparation in secondary school (Kornell & Bjork,…”
Fatima, N. (2026) · doi:10.65758/isbn.9786277813611
Pop Quiz with a Twist: Assessing the Effectiveness of Enhanced Two-Stage Pop Quizzes
Tennakoon, K. (2026) · Teaching and Learning Inquiry · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.14.49
“In particular, students value dialogic feedback, where students and instructors engage in a real-time, two-way, interactive process, as a system of guidance rather than a one-way transmission of information (Beaumont et al. 2011).”
An Ongoing Journey of Digital Feedback Literacy Development
Schluer, J. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80686-855-120261021
(2015) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L.
- Affiliations
- Edge Hill University (GB)
- Liverpool Hope University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Beaumont, Chris
- ORCID
- Beaumont, Chris
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 671-687
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2010319006
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 56.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
- Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- assessment feedback, feedback quality, student experience, transition to higher education, formative feedback, summative assessment, dialogic feedback, self-directed learning, first-year students, school-to-university transition, student perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review