The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English
Abstract
by Theresa Lillis and Mary Jane Curry, London, Routledge, 2010, ix + 203 pp., £24.99 (paperback), ISBN 978‐0‐415‐46883‐1 At the heart of this book is a research project about how scholars in educat...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000115 · Cited by 722
A bibliometric analysis of occupational therapy publications
Brown, T., Gutman, S. A., Ho, Y.-S., & Fong, K. N. K. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2017.1329344 · Cited by 51
Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: writing perceptions, well-being and productivity
Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412 · Cited by 48
Gilmore, A. (2015) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444815000269 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Delamont, S.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 505-506
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2013137238
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 204.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075079.2011.586505
- The paper
- Delamont, S. (2011). Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.586505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
