Cited by 64Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility InnovationsUrban Transport and Accessibility

Responses to Transit Information among Car-drivers: Regret-based Models and Simulations

Chorus, Caspar G., Molin, Eric J. E., Van Wee, Bert, Arentze, Theo A., Timmermans, Harry J. P.·2006·Transportation Planning and Technology

Abstract

This article investigates the use and effects of transit information among car drivers that consider transit as a mode-option in their choice set. It does so by first presenting a theoretical model of travel information use and effect, based on the integration of notions of Bayesian updating into a regret-based framework of travel choice. Subsequently, numerical simulation of the model provides insights into the mechanisms behind information use and effect in a mode-choice context where a traveler has both car– as well as transit-options in their choice set, and prefers traveling by car over riding by transit. These simulations show that the perceived value of acquiring transit information is limited by a number of factors. Furthermore they demonstrate that, even in the case where transit information is acquired, and the message is favorable to transit, its impact on mode choices will also be limited. Given these results for non-habitual car-drivers, it is suggested that for car-drivers in general (thus including the large share of habitual drivers), conservative estimates regarding the impact of transit information provision on modal shift would be realistic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03081060600905434

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models that explicitly consider risk-seeking vs. risk-avoiding behaviour, such as prospect and regret theory, have been explored recently in travel behaviour research.

    “Models, which do explicitly consider risk-seeking vs. risk-avoiding behaviour, such as prospect and regret theory, have been explored recently in travel behaviour research”

    From Activity-based models of travel demand: promises, progress and prospects (2014) · cites this paper as Chorus, Molin, Van Wee, Arentze, & Timmermans, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chorus, C. G., Molin, E. J. E., Van Wee, B., Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. P.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Chorus, Caspar G.
Venue
Transportation Planning and Technology
Published
2006-08
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
249-271
ISSN
  • 0308-1060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0354
OpenAlex
W2049156178
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transportation Planning and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Federal Transit Administration
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
public transport information, car drivers, mode choice, Bayesian updating, information use, modal shift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review