The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governing development: neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic woman
Abstract
This paper addresses the emergence of microcredit programmes as a preferred strategy for poverty alleviation world-wide. Taking the paradigmatic case of Nepal, it engages a genealogical approach to trace how Nepalese planners' enduring concerns about rural development intersect in surprising (and gendered) ways with donors' present focus on deepening financial markets. In the resulting microcredit model, the onus for rural lending is devolved from commercial banks to subsidized 'rural development banks' and women borrowers become the target of an aggressive 'selfhelp' approach to development. As a governmental strategy, microcredit thus constitutes social citizenship and women's needs in a manner consistent with neoliberalism. Drawing on ethnographic research, the paper also considers the progressive and regressive possibilities in the articulation of such constructed subjectivities with local cultural ideologies and social processes. Such an investigation can in turn provide a foundation for articulating a more normative agenda for development studies – grounded in the perspectives of those in subordinate social locations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This 'letting go' and the separations it entails are a constitutive feature of BoP entrepreneurship, as success hinges on bracketing off the 'economically active' from the underproductive poor (Roy, 2010: 99;Rankin, 2001).”
From Remaking Africa’s Informal Economies: Youth, Entrepreneurship and the Promise of Inclusion at the Bottom of the Pyramid (2016) · cites this paper as Rankin, 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877 · cited 3×
“Speci cally, three analytical constructs – political rationality, governmental strategy, and governmental self-regulation (see Foucault 1991; Gordon 1991; Miller and Rose 1990 for summaries of this method) – generate important critical questions.”
Background
Cited by
Gershon, I. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/660866 · Cited by 616
Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2016) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2015.1126249 · Cited by 144
The Rationality of Empowerment: Microcredit, Accumulation by Dispossession, and the Gendered Economy
Keating, C., Rasmussen, C., & Rishi, P. (2010) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/652911 · Cited by 140
The resilient child, human development and the “postdemocracy
Henderson, J., & Denny, K. (2015) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2015.24 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Rankin, K. N.
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-37
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2113221760
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.