The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global commodity chain analysis and the French filière approach: comparison and critique
Abstract
This article reviews two approaches to the study of economic restructuring which focus on commodity-specific dynamics of change. The first is the global commodity chain (GCC) approach, which has been developed primarily for the analysis of industrial commodities.The second is the francophone filière tradition, which has been applied mostly to agricultural commodities originating from former French colonies. The article finds that the GCC approach has a more coherent framework than the filière approach, although it is still far from constituting a fully fledged 'theory'. The authors provide a number of suggestions for improving some of its key concepts. They also suggest that the GCC approach can be enriched by some of the insights gained in filière work, especially in terms of improving historical coverage and depth, enlarging the analysis to agricultural commodities, better handling of regulation issues, and including quality convention issues in analysing commodity chain structure and restructuring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216
Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward
Bair, J. (2005) · Competition & Change · doi:10.1179/102452905x45382 · Cited by 908
Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains
Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/0308514042000329315 · Cited by 906
Self-citationIntroduction: Globalisation, Value Chains and Development
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon*, T. J. (2001) · IDS Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003001.x · Cited by 889
Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises
Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400076 · Cited by 888
Metadata
- Authors
- Raikes, P., Friis Jensen, M., & Ponte, S.
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-417
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2128232620
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global commodity chain analysis and the French filière approach: comparison and critique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03085140050084589
- The paper
- Raikes, P., Friis Jensen, M., & Ponte, S. (2000). Global commodity chain analysis and the French filière approach: comparison and critique. Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140050084589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.