The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: from segregation to apartheid1
Abstract
Conventionally, Apartheid is regarded as no more than an intensification of the earlier policy of Segregation and is ascribed simplistically to the particular racial ideology of the ruling Nationalist Party. In this article substantial differences between Apartheid and Segregation are identified and explained by reference to the changing relations of capitalist and African pre-capitalist modes of production. The supply of African migrant labour-power, at a wage below its cost of reproduction, is a function of the existence of the pre-capitalist mode. The dominant capitalist mode of production tends to dissolve the pre-capitalist mode thus threatening the conditions of reproduction of cheap migrant labour-power and thereby generating intense conflict against the system of Segregation. In these conditions Segregation gives way to Apartheid which provides the specific mechanism for maintaining labour-power cheap through the elaboration of the entire system of domination and control and the transformation of the function of the pre-capitalist societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social institutions and access to resources
Berry, S. (1989) · Africa · doi:10.2307/1160762 · Cited by 423
A political economy of land reform in South Africa
Hall, R. (2004) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/0305624042000262257 · Cited by 196
On Tax Efforts and Colonial Heritage in Africa
Mkandawire, T. (2010) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2010.500660 · Cited by 181
Missing men? The debate over rural poverty and women‐headed households in Southern Africa
O'laughlin, B. (1998) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066159808438665 · Cited by 117
Land reform in South Africa is failing. Can it be saved?
Cousins, B. (2016) · Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa · doi:10.1353/trn.2016.0030 · Cited by 41
Maharaj, B. (2020) · GeoJournal Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25369-1_3 · Cited by 36
Class, race and ethnicity: A critique of Cox's theory
Miles, R. (1980) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.1980.9993298 · Cited by 31
THE LEGACIES OF THE NATIVES LAND ACT OF 1913
Hall, R. (2014) · Scriptura · doi:10.7833/113-0-721 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolpe, H.
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-456
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2111388567
- Cited by
- 1,164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.