The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new paradigm for economic analysis?: Recent convergences in French social science and an exploration of the convention theory approach with a consideration of its application to the analysis of the agrofood system
Abstract
This article reviews recent convergences in the French social literature, particularly those emerging between the sociology and economics of innovation, regulation theory and convention theory, focusing primarily on the contribution of this latter. In the first section, examples of collaboration across these different currents are discussed and the migration of key concepts identified. This is followed by a more detailed comparsion of the respective contributions of convention and regulation theory which has dominated ‘non-standard’ economic thinking in France since the late 1970s. The main features of convention theory are then presented together with an appreciation of this approach's potential for providing a new framework within which to situate the emergence, consolidation and transformation of different patterns of economic co-ordination. this potential is illustrated with reference to the analysis of the agrofood sector. The article focuses specifically on convention theory since its contribution has been less widely discussed in the Anglo-Saxon literature than its ‘rival/complement’ regulation theory. Areas of convergence and contrast with recent developments in the new micro-economics and the new economic sociology are also considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise
Chandler, A. D. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.79 · Cited by 847
Cited by
The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life
Stark, D. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831005 · Cited by 1,011
Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains
Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/0308514042000329315 · Cited by 906
The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda
Goodman, D. (2003) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00043-8 · Cited by 695
Governing global value chains: an introduction
Gibbon, P., Bair, J., & Ponte, S. (2008) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140802172656 · Cited by 630
Fair trade: quality, market and conventions
Renard, M.-C. (2003) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00051-7 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkinson, J.
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-339
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2243030514
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new paradigm for economic analysis?: Recent convergences in French social science and an exploration of the convention theory approach with a consideration of its application to the analysis of the agrofood system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03085149700000017
- The paper
- Wilkinson, J. (1997). A new paradigm for economic analysis?: Recent convergences in French social science and an exploration of the convention theory approach with a consideration of its application to the analysis of the agrofood system. Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.