Cited by 0Historical Geography and CartographyLatin American history and cultureHistory of Science and Natural History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Jesuit Missionary Cartography of the Upper Amazon, 1689 to 1789: By Irina Saladin. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2024. ISBN 978-9-4637-2565-1 (hardcover); ISBN 978-9-0485-5374-7 (ebook). Pp. 342, illus. €146.00.

Erbig, Jeffrey·2025·Imago Mundi

Abstract

Map histories of colonial South America often conceptualise three periods of cartographic production: a sixteenth-century emphasis on continental coastlines, an intermediate phase in which Jesuits ...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03085694.2025.2577378

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Erbig, J.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
Erbig, Jeffrey
Venue
Imago Mundi
Published
2025-07-03
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
230-231
ISSN
  • 0308-5694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-7801
OpenAlex
W7117238924
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Imago Mundi (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
Keywords
Jesuit missionaries, missionary cartography, Upper Amazon, colonial South America, history of cartography, colonial cartography, missionary exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review