Forum The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe: Modelling the colonisation of Sahul
Abstract
Elsewhere we have developed a speculative model of the early human colonisation of Sahul (Pleistocene Australia-New Guinea). Here we elaborate it, using theory from behavioural ecology, and data from palaeoclimatology and modern hunter-gatherer ethnography. We argue that colonisers focused mainly on coastal ecotones while crossing Wallacea, but spread more widely across favourable habitats after landing on Sahul. Movement was archaeologically instantaneous, driven primarily by serial depletion of high-ranked prey. Human populations subsequently remained far smaller than sometimes imagined, probably because of difficult climatic and environmental conditions. Archaeological data are generally consistent with these expectations. These findings challenge the frequent assertion that human colonisation alone led to significant changes in Sahul ecology, and may help explain the simplicity of its Pleistocene lithic technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first anatomically modern human populations to arrive in Island Southeast Asia most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul.
“Nonetheless, the current fossil and archaeological records, together mounting genetic evidence from across ISEA, point to the widespread presence of archaic hominins east of Wallace's Line 26 , and indicate that the first AMH populations to arrive in ISEA most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul 4752 .”
From Widespread Denisovan ancestry in Island Southeast Asia but no evidence of substantial super-archaic hominin admixture (2021) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 183
- Authors
- O’Connell, J. F., & Allen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- ORCID
- O’Connell, James. F.
- Venue
- Australian Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-31
- ISSN
- 0312-2417 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0363
- OpenAlex
- W2258124946
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 62.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
- Keywords
- Wallacea, behavioral ecology, paleoclimatology, population size, lithic technology, early human dispersal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review