The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles
Abstract
This report is intended as a contribution to the theory of demand for insurance. In many circumstances, it appears that, given a range of alternative possible insurance policies, the insured would prefer a policy offering complete coverage beyond a deductible. In an earlier paper (Arrow [1]; reprinted in Arrow [3], pp. 212-216), this argument was developed for the case where the risk being insured against was, effectively, loss of income. Recently, Ehrlich and Becker [4] have extended these results considerably, as well as analyzing other responses of the insured to the price of insurance, responses beyond the scope of this study. For some other related work, see Pashigian, Schkade, and Menefee [8], Smith [12], and Gould [6]. However, income is not the only uncertainty, especially in the context of health insurance, and only under special and unrealistic circumstances can it be held that the other uncertainties have income equivalents. Put loosely, the marginal utility of income will in general depend not only on the amount of income but also on the state of the individual or, more generally, on the state of the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.i · Cited by 8,043
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1964) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913738 · Cited by 4,874
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1976) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912743 · Cited by 4,654
Foundations of Economic Analysis.
Stigler, G. J., & Samuelson, P. A. (1948) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280713 · Cited by 4,128
UNCERTAINTY AND THE WELFARE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL CARE
Arrow, K. J. (2003) · Uncertain Times · doi:10.2307/j.ctv11sn34h.6 · Cited by 4,078
Self-citationEssays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing.
Hakansson, N. H., & Arrow, K. J. (1972) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2978877 · Cited by 3,991
Self-citationFoundations of Economic Analysis
Ruist, E., & Samuelson, P. A. (1948) · Ekonomisk Tidskrift · doi:10.2307/3438190 · Cited by 2,965
Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing.
Ozga, S. A., & Arrow, K. J. (1966) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2552628 · Cited by 1,888
Self-citationMarket Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection
Ehrlich, I., & Becker, G. S. (1972) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259916 · Cited by 1,391
Ramsey, F. P. (2016) · Readings in Formal Epistemology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_3 · Cited by 1,301
Cited by
Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification
Townsend, R. M. (1979) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0 · Cited by 3,204
The demand for deductibles in private health insurance
Van de Ven, W. P. M. M., & Van Praag, B. M. S. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90028-2 · Cited by 1,367
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrow, K. J.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 1974
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-42
- ISSN
- 0346-1238 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2030
- OpenAlex
- W2093404588
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03461238.1974.10408659
- The paper
- Arrow, K. J. (1974). Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1974.10408659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.