Cited by 84Insect Pest Control StrategiesEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Azadirachtin biopesticide: A review of studies conducted on its analytical chemistry, environmental behaviour and biological effects

Sundaram, Kanth M.S.·1996·Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B

Abstract

This paper provides a brief review of studies conducted in our laboratory on the analytical chemistry, environmental behaviour and biological effects of azadirachtin‐A, a neem‐based pesticide. Azadirachtin‐A (AZ‐A) was isolated from samples of neem seed kernels, leaves, bark, root and stem, obtained from Kanthayapalayam, South India. The extracts were subjected to column cleanup and AZ‐A concentration was quantified by using a high‐performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. A flow diagram is given describing the procedures involved. AZ‐A was also isolated from four commercial formulations and from several forestry substrates, and its concentration in each sample was quantified by HPLC. To investigate the environmental behaviour of AZ‐A, five studies were conducted: (i) persistence of AZ‐A on balsam fir and red oak foliage, (ii) dissipation of AZ‐A in forest nursery soils, (iii) leaching in sandy loam forest soil, (iv) adsorption and desorption of AZ‐A in sandy loam soil, and (v) rate of hydrolysis in buffer solutions and natural waters. A summary of the data is given in the paper. The biological effects of azadirachtin on two‐spotted spider mites infecting young trembling aspen plants was studied after applying AZ‐A and its four formulations onto aspen leaf discs. The repellency, oviposition deterrence, mortality and fecundity were investigated. The data indicated that the toxic effects were significantly influenced by AZ‐A concentration and formulation ingredients. Th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03601239609373045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundaram, K. M. S.
Affiliations
Canadian Forest Service (CA)
Corresponding author
Sundaram, Kanth M.S.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
Published
1996-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
913-948
ISSN
  • 0360-1234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4109
OpenAlex
W2031461105
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
azadirachtin, HPLC determination, environmental fate, leaching, hydrolysis, photostability, UV stabilizers, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, Tetranychus urticae, oviposition deterrence, repellent activity, Populus tremuloides, neem formulations, energy transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review