Senior technology exploration, learning, and acceptance (STELA) model: from exploration to use – a longitudinal randomized controlled trial
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the process from technology exploration to acceptance for older adults. A senior technology exploration, learning, and acceptance (STELA) model is proposed to examine the technology exploration and learning process. Adopting a new technology can pose challenges with increasing age. In order to help older adults use new technologies so they can be included in many important resources and support that are routinely accessed online, it is essential to understand factors affecting their technology adoption, and what the learning and adoption processes are like. This study employs four waves of data from a randomized controlled trial computer training intervention with 195 older adults (65 and older) in 19 different assisted and independent living communities (AICs). The results show the moderating effect of technology training and support for the relationship of exploring a technology and perceived difficulties of learning. These results suggest that training programs that are specially designed for older adults and continued support are needed to help older adults explore technologies and facilitate their learning process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research has suggested social support to approach learning technology.
“prior research has suggested social support to approach learning technology [2,56,67]”
From Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Spending time on exploration can give rise to learning difficulties for older adults.
“spending time on exploration can give rise to learning difficulties for older adults [67]”
From Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Studies exploring older adults' technology acceptance have demonstrated that the availability of support can reduce their perceived difficulty of exploring new technologies.
“Studies exploring older adults' technology acceptance have demonstrated that the availability of support can reduce their perceived difficulty of exploring new technologies [2,56,67].”
From Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Tsai, H.-Y. S., Rikard, R. V., Cotten, S. R., & Shillair, R.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tsai, Hsin-Yi Sandy
- Venue
- Educational Gerontology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-11-18
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 728-743
- ISSN
- 0360-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0472
- OpenAlex
- W2982854859
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Gerontology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- older adults, technology adoption, technology acceptance, technology exploration, technological learning, perceived learning difficulty, technology support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review