Cited by 57Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCancer survivorship and careMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Personal Growth in Mothers: Examination of the Suitability of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory as a Measurement Tool

Taubman–Ben-Ari, Orit, Findler, Liora, Sharon, Niva·2011·Women & Health

Abstract

The validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for the experience of motherhood was examined in three separate studies, conducted in Israel between 2008 and 2010. Study 1 (n=150) compared the answers of new first-time mothers to an open-ended question regarding changes following childbirth with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory dimensions. Study 2 replicated this procedure using a more diverse sample (n=157) to confirm the usefulness of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory among various sub-groups of mothers (first-time and non-first-time mothers, mothers of twins and singletons, mothers of pre-term and full-term infants). Study 3 (n=152 mothers and their own mothers) sought to corroborate mothers' scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory by means of their own mothers' reports of their daughters' growth following childbirth. This study also examined the applicability of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory's five factor structure-new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life-to the population of mothers. The findings indicated that the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory is indeed an effective instrument for the measurement of mothers' perceived positive changes following childbirth, and can be used for this purpose at least for several years after the birth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03630242.2011.614324

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTG requires a level of upheaval or crisis to promote subsequent growth and parenthood has been identified as particularly ripe for this.

    “While not requiring a traumatizing event, PTG requires a level of upheaval or crisis to promote subsequent growth and parenthood has been identified as particularly ripe for this (Taubman‐Ben‐Ari et al., 2011).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 57

Authors
Taubman–Ben-Ari, O., Findler, L., & Sharon, N.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Women & Health
Published
2011-08-31
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
604-622
ISSN
  • 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0331
OpenAlex
W1985508526
Cited by
57
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, posttraumatic growth, motherhood, childbirth, primiparous women, measurement validity, factor structure, new possibilities, spiritual transformation, appreciation of life, personal strengths, mothers of twins, preterm infants
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude, Emotions, Female, Humans, Israel, Life Change Events, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Twins, Reproducibility of Results, Spirituality, Parturition, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review