Personal Growth in Mothers: Examination of the Suitability of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory as a Measurement Tool
Abstract
The validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for the experience of motherhood was examined in three separate studies, conducted in Israel between 2008 and 2010. Study 1 (n=150) compared the answers of new first-time mothers to an open-ended question regarding changes following childbirth with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory dimensions. Study 2 replicated this procedure using a more diverse sample (n=157) to confirm the usefulness of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory among various sub-groups of mothers (first-time and non-first-time mothers, mothers of twins and singletons, mothers of pre-term and full-term infants). Study 3 (n=152 mothers and their own mothers) sought to corroborate mothers' scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory by means of their own mothers' reports of their daughters' growth following childbirth. This study also examined the applicability of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory's five factor structure-new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life-to the population of mothers. The findings indicated that the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory is indeed an effective instrument for the measurement of mothers' perceived positive changes following childbirth, and can be used for this purpose at least for several years after the birth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PTG requires a level of upheaval or crisis to promote subsequent growth and parenthood has been identified as particularly ripe for this.
“While not requiring a traumatizing event, PTG requires a level of upheaval or crisis to promote subsequent growth and parenthood has been identified as particularly ripe for this (Taubman‐Ben‐Ari et al., 2011).”
From Parenthood during the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic: <scp>Post‐traumatic</scp> growth amongst university students (2023) · cites this paper as Taubman‐Ben‐Ari et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Taubman–Ben-Ari, O., Findler, L., & Sharon, N.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Venue
- Women & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-08-31
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 604-622
- ISSN
- 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0331
- OpenAlex
- W1985508526
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Women & Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, posttraumatic growth, motherhood, childbirth, primiparous women, measurement validity, factor structure, new possibilities, spiritual transformation, appreciation of life, personal strengths, mothers of twins, preterm infants
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude, Emotions, Female, Humans, Israel, Life Change Events, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Twins, Reproducibility of Results, Spirituality, Parturition, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review