Cited by 5Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSexual function and dysfunction studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose spouses’ coping skills promote qol and dyadic coping of menopausal women?

Abstract

Lack of menopausal knowledge damages the quality of life (QoL) and couples' relationships. A new approach to prevent marital distress based upon stress and coping has introduced Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET). The present study assessed the effect of menopause care training using CCET approach on QoL and coping in menopausal women. This educational interventional study was conducted in 2019 on 80 postmenopausal women and their spouses. The couples were randomly selected from health care centers using the cluster random sampling method and were divided into control and intervention groups. Four training sessions were held for the intervention group. Data were collected using The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire, menopausal knowledge questionnaire, and Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) and were analyzed using independent Sample t-test, Paired Sample T-Test, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in SPSS version 25 and Amos version 21 software. At the beginning of the study, there was no significant difference in menopausal knowledge, QoL, and dyadic coping between the two groups. However, the CCET approach significantly increased menopausal knowledge, coping in couples and women's QoL in the intervention group compared to the control group. CCET can help couples to cope with menopausal symptoms more efficiently.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03630242.2021.1917478

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aksu H., 2011, Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 38, 251
  2. Bodenmann, G. 2008. Dyadic coping inventory: Manual] dyadisches coping inventar: Testmanual. Huber Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Fixation, Bern, Switzerland, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guy_Bodenmann/publication/323285418_Dyadic_Coping_Inventory/links/5a901eeea6fdccecff00ce52/Dyadic-Coping-Inventory.pdf.
  3. Hidiroglu S., 2014, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 64, 10311036

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yarelahi, M., Karimi, M., & Asadollahi, A.
Affiliations
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Asadollahi, Abdolrahim
Venue
Women & Health
Published
2021-04-25
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
431-439
ISSN
  • 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0331
OpenAlex
W3157694991
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (N0: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
menopause, postmenopausal women, dyadic coping, quality of life, menopausal knowledge, menopausal symptoms, marital distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Menopause, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review