Cited by 45Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesParental Involvement in EducationEducational Outcomes and Influences

Combining background media with doing homework: Incidence of background media use and perceived effects

Beentjes, Johannes W.J., Koolstra, Cees M., van der Voort, Tom H. A.·1996·Communication Education

Abstract

A survey study was conducted to explore the frequency with which students use background media in self‐instructional home study settings, and the perceived effects of students' use of background media on their homework performance. A questionnaire administered to 1,700 students in Grades 8 and 10 asked students to indicate how often they perform different types of homework assignments and how often they incorporate different types of background media while doing them. In addition, students indicated how they divide their attention between homework assignments and background media, and how they perceive the effects that media may have on their performance on different types of homework assignments. Results indicated that the frequency with which students reportedly combined homework and media depended on the type of schoolwork (learning assignments versus paper‐and‐pencil assignments), type of background medium (audio media or TV), and the students' level of secondary education. In general, students felt that their performance on learning assignments was impaired by the use of background media. Their performance on paper‐and‐pencil assignments, however, was somewhat increased by the use of background audio media and music TV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03634529609379032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Media use during academic activities was related to lower perceived performance on study assignments.

    “namely, lower perceived performance on study assignments (Beentjes et al., 1996),”

    From The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review (2015) · cites this paper as Beentjes et al., 1996

  • Two of three studies showed that media use during academic activities was related to lower perceived learning.

    “Two of three studies showed that media use during academic activities was related to lower perceived learning,”

    From The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review (2015) · cites this paper as Beentjes et al., 1996

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 45

Authors
Beentjes, J. W. J., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Communication Education
Published
1996-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
59-72
ISSN
  • 0363-4523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-5795
OpenAlex
W2087253746
Cited by
45
References
9
Citations by year
2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communication Education (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
homework performance, home study, self-education, multitasking, attention allocation, audio media, television, high school students, learning tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review