Cited by 86Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Influence of biochar produced from different pyrolysis temperature on nutrient retention and leaching

Cheng, Hongguang, Jones, Davey L., Hill, Paul, Bastami, Mohd Saufi, Tu, Cheng long·2018·Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Abstract

Biochar application has been received much attention because biochar can improve the fertilizer utilization efficiency of soil. However, the effect of biochar produced at different temperature on the nutrient retention and leaching remains poorly understood. In this study, we observed the nutrients leaching from a sandy loam soil amended with biochar produced at different temperature. The properties of biochars produced from wheat straw at four contrasting pyrolysis temperatures (250, 350, 450, and 550°C) showed that increasing pyrolysis temperature increased pH value and specific surface area but reduced the electrical conductivity and cation exchange capacity. With the temperature increased, the nitrogen loss was significant decreased (p > 0.05) from 109.6 mg to 53.3 mg in biochar amended soil. However, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), available P, Na and K were significant increased (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that the pyrolytic temperature has a great influence on biochar properties, which in turn affect the leaching of the available nutrients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03650340.2017.1384545

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 86

Authors
Cheng, H., Jones, D. L., Hill, P., Bastami, M. S., & Tu, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Hongguang
Venue
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science
Published
2017-10-05
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
850-859
ISSN
  • 0365-0340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-3567
OpenAlex
W2756924443
Cited by
86
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571130041, 41573012)
  • the National Key Research and development Program of China (2016YFC0502602)
  • the Guizhou province overseas students science and technology innovation projects (2015(10))
  • the Opening Fund of the State Key Environmental Geochemistry (SKLEG2014912)
  • the Welsh European Funding Office under the SEREN program
  • The key Agriculture Science and Technology program of Guizhou Province (NY [2012]3019, NY[2015]3018-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
biochar, pyrolysis temperature, nutrient retention, nutrient leaching, wheat straw, sandy loam soil, nitrogen loss, dissolved organic carbon, available phosphorus, cation exchange capacity, soil amendment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review