CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nasal hump removal in Asians

Jin, Hong-Ryul, Jin, Hong-Ryul, Won, Tae-Bin·2007·Acta Oto-Laryngologica
DOI 10.1080/03655230701624947
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Conclusion. When performing nasal hump reduction in Asians, the amount of hump resection should be tailored based on the predicted amount of dorsal augmentation and tip projection needed. Common complications of hump removal can be prevented by conservative hump removal and efficient use of spreader graft or camouflage cartilage grafts. Objectives. The authors present surgical features and results of nasal hump reduction in 51 Asian patients. Subjects and methods. Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent nasal hump reduction were analyzed retrospectively. Characteristics of the nose accompanying the hump, approaches and techniques used, combined procedures, results and complications were evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative standardized photographs of the face were evaluated to judge objectively the aesthetic outcomes of the surgery. Results. The most frequent aesthetic characteristic accompanying the hump nose was a relatively low nasal dorsum and tip projection compared to the ideal Asian aesthetic norms. An endonasal approach was used for 22 patients (43%) and an external approach for 29 patients (57%). En bloc resection of the bony and cartilaginous hump, followed by rasping was the most commonly used methods for hump resection. Combined procedures included septoplasty (89%), dorsal augmentation with cartilage graft (73%), lateral osteotomy (69%), nasal tip surgery (49%) and spreader graft (39%). Objective evaluation showed complete correction of the hump in 70%, slight under-correction in 26%, and persistent hump (although less than preoperative) in 4%. Complications such as "inverted V" deformity, saddle nose, and nasal obstruction were not encountered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03655230701624947

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wu WT, 1992, Ann Acad Med Singapore, 21, 176

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jin, H.-R., Jin, H.-R., & Won, T.-B.
Affiliations
Hallym University (KR)
ORCID
Won, Tae-Bin
Venue
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-01
Volume
127
Issue
sup558
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2251
DOI
10.1080/03655230701624947
OpenAlex
W2157785862
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Oto-Laryngologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
Asian patients, nasal aesthetics, endonasal approach, external approach, spreader grafts, septoplasty, lateral osteotomy, nasal tip surgery, dorsal augmentation, surgical complications, saddle nose, nasal obstruction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cartilage, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review