Cited by 0Crustacean biology and ecologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Behavioral compensation masks morphological trade-offs in the locomotion of the terrestrial hermit crab Coenobita compressus

Morales, Lucía, Bonilla, Braulio, Rodriguez, Candelario, Añino, Yostin, Bruner-Montero, Gaspar·2026·Ethology Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

The trade-off between protection and mobility is a central principle in functional ecology and is particularly relevant in terrestrial hermit crabs, which depend on gastropod shells for defense while potentially incurring locomotor costs. Under the trade-off hypothesis, heavier or asymmetric shells are expected to impair movement, especially on heterogeneous or uneven substrates. To evaluate this prediction, we examined locomotor behavior in the land hermit crab Coenobita compressus on Coiba Island (Panama), integrating field observations with controlled experimental assays across substrates differing in topography and compaction. Contrary to classical expectations, shell weight and morphology exerted limited effects on locomotor performance. Instead, individuals exhibited substantial behavioral flexibility, adjusting posture and gait across environmental contexts. These findings suggest that C. compressus may buffer mechanical constraints imposed by shell architecture through adaptive behavioral compensation. Our results support an expanded interpretation of the trade-off framework in which behavioral plasticity attenuates, rather than eliminates, functional trade-offs, potentially enhancing performance in dynamic coastal habitats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03949370.2026.2659317

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36

Authors
Morales, L., Bonilla, B., Rodriguez, C., Añino, Y., & Bruner-Montero, G.
Affiliations
  • Coiba Scientific Station (Coiba AIP) (PA)
  • Estación Científica Coiba (COIBA-AIP), Calle Gustavo Lara, Edificio 145B, Ciudad del Saber, Clayton 0843-01853, Panamá
  • Universidad de Panamá (PA)
  • Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (PA)
Corresponding author
Bruner-Montero, Gaspar
Venue
Ethology Ecology & Evolution
Published
2026-05-21
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
570-579
ISSN
  • 0394-9370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1828-7131
OpenAlex
W7161940011
Cited by
0
References
36
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethology Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI), SENACYT, Panama
  • Estación Científica Coiba
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
Coenobita compressus, terrestrial hermit crabs, shell weight, shell morphology, locomotion, compensatory behavior, behavioral plasticity, gait, posture, substrate topography, substrate compaction, functional trade-offs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review