Cited by 19European Union Policy and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyEuropean Politics and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Japan: the pitfalls of path dependency?

Open access
Gilson, Julie·2016·Journal of European Integration

Abstract

This article examines the current attempt by the European Union and Japan to negotiate a Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA). Sitting alongside negotiations for an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), this SPA represents an attempt to reignite bilateral relations between these two global powerhouses. Still confined by the origins of their institutionalised partnership in 1991, this article argues that both sides find it hard to break away from earlier functional and normative assumptions about their relative significance and about each other, in order to forge a new meaningful, overarching partnership. It examines the development of Japan–EU relations building up to the preparations for this SPA, against the background of path-dependent processes of engagement. Path dependency in its various forms ‘views institutions as ‘carriers of history,’ which maintain existing behavioural norms and cultural patterns throughout time’. Despite some of the problems such claims elicit, as will be explored below, this article proposes that path dependency – and a particular focus on ‘imprinting’ – offers a useful starting point for explaining the apparent institutional inertia and incremental change that characterise much of this bilateral relationship today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07036337.2016.1176027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.2307/40203577 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/095169280101300302 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/jcms.2011.49.issue-s1 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0007123411000147 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/09555803.2012.699453 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4395-4_2 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0954-349X(94)90002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1057/9780230627918 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/inta.2013.89.issue-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0010836713485387 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/jcms.2011.49.issue-s1 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/0955580032000108397 · DOI
  13. 10.1353/hrq.2016.0003 · DOI
  14. Gilson J. A., 2011, Routledge Handbook of Japanese Politics, 350
  15. 10.1057/9780333981399 · DOI
  16. Hamanaka Shintaro, 2015, Asian Free Trade Agreements and WTO Compatibility
  17. Hay Colin, 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, 56
  18. Hook Glenn D., 2005, Japan’s International Relations
  19. Hook Glenn D, 2011, Japan's International Relations, 3rd edition, 10.4324/9780203804056 · DOI
  20. Hughes Christopher W., 2015, The Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
  21. 10.1525/as.2014.54.1.101 · DOI
  22. Katz Richard, 2014, Foreign Affairs, 93, 133
  23. 10.1177/03058298060350010201 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/19416520.2013.766076 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/01402390701431832 · DOI
  26. Oppenheim Phillip, 1991, The New Masters: Can the West Match Japan?
  27. Pempel T. J., 2015, Asian Perspective, 39, 361, 10.1353/apr.2015.0015 · DOI
  28. 10.1287/orsc.2014.0916 · DOI
  29. 10.1353/sais.2015.0030 · DOI
  30. Renard Thomas, 2015, European Strategic Partnerships Observatory Policy Brief, 2
  31. Sewell William H., 1996, The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, 245
  32. 10.1080/09512748.2014.970049 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/09512740903398348 · DOI
  34. Thelen Kathleen, 1998, Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, 9
  35. Tyszkiewicz Radosław, 2013, Polish Institute of International Affairs Policy Paper, 9
  36. de Vasconcelos Álvaro, 2010, A Strategy for EU Foreign Policy
  37. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x · DOI
  38. Wiessala Georg, 2013, Re-Orienting the Fundamentals: Human Rights and New Connections in EU-Asia Relations
  39. 10.1080/00472336.2014.956138 · DOI

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Gilson, J.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilson, Julie
Venue
Journal of European Integration
Published
2016-05-13
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
791-806
ISSN
  • 0703-6337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2280
OpenAlex
W2374312351
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of European Integration (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
Keywords
EU-Japan relations, path dependence, imprinting, institutional inertia, incremental change, bilateral relations, Economic Partnership Agreements, normative assumptions, institutional change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Japan: the pitfalls of path dependency? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07036337.2016.1176027
The paper
Gilson, J. (2016). The Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Japan: the pitfalls of path dependency? Journal of European Integration. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1176027