Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rehabilitation and analysis of Canadian daily precipitation time series

Open access
Mekis, Eva, Hogg, William D.·1999·Atmosphere-Ocean

Abstract

The goal of this project was to develop adjustment procedures to use daily resolution data to generate high quality time series of precipitation and to perform regional trend analyses on the resulting datasets. A total of 69 locations, most with data covering the period 1900–96 were used. Data availability in much of the Canadian Arctic was restricted to 1948–96. By using daily data, improved corrections to precipitation data, not practical with monthly data, could be implemented. For each of three rain gauge types, corrections to account for wind undercatch and evaporation were implemented. Gauge specific wetting loss corrections were applied for each rainfall event. For snowfall, ruler measurements were used throughout the time series, to minimize potential discontinuities introduced by the adoption of Nipher shielded snow gauge measurements in the mid‐1960s. Density corrections based upon coincident ruler and Nipher measurements were applied to all ruler measurements. Where necessary, records from neighbouring stations were joined employing a technique based on a simple ratio of observations. The adjustment procedures used remove systematic biases due to changes in the measurement program but do not account for inhomogeneities related to local site changes etc. It is assumed that such local changes introduce random inhomogeneities which are smoothed by combining the results from numerous stations. Work to adjust data from about 500 stations and generate monthly grids or maps is well underway but preliminary trend results were examined for this project by grouping stations by region. Regional time series of normalized anomalies are computed as the arithmetic mean of stations within the region. Annual and seasonal graphs of national and regional time series are presented. The national time series shows an increase in precipitation of 1.7% of mean/decade over 1948–95. The greatest increase is in the autumn. For the same period, Canada north of 55°N showed an increase of 2.3% of mean/decade, more than the south, but much less than the 4–5% of mean/decade suggested by Groisman and Easterling (1994). The ratio of liquid to solid precipitation for Canada has declined slightly over the 1948–95 period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07055900.1999.9649621

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Mekis, E., & Hogg, W. D.
Venue
Atmosphere-Ocean
Published
1999-03
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
53-85
ISSN
  • 0705-5900 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-9214
OpenAlex
W2093685627
Cited by
350
References
0
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rehabilitation and analysis of Canadian daily precipitation time series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07055900.1999.9649621
The paper
Mekis, E., & Hogg, W. D. (1999). Rehabilitation and analysis of Canadian daily precipitation time series. Atmosphere-Ocean. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1999.9649621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.