Cited by 86Eurasian Exchange NetworksMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical GeographyChinese history and philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Boundaries, Maps, and Movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian Empires in Early Modern Central Eurasia

Perdue, Peter C.·1998·The International History Review

Abstract

Comparative responses to global processes that affected China and the other early modern empires. Central Eurasia during the seventeent and eighteenth centuries offers one important site because three agrarian states contended for power: the Muscovite/Russian empire, expanding eastwards across Siberia; the Manchu Qing expanding first south-east, then northwest into the Central Asian steppes, deserts, and oases; and the Mongolian empire of the Zunghars, who created an autonomous state in western Mongolia, Turkestan, and Tibet. Although, between the mid-seventeenth and the mid-eighteenth centuries, the Zunghars rivalled Russian and Chinese power, by 1760 the Qing had crushed the state and exterminated the Zunghar people. The Qing then established permanent control, which lasted until the fall of the empire in 1911, over all of present-day Mongolia (Inner and Outer), Xinjiang, and Tibet. The elimination of a powerful, independent Mongol-nomadic state in the steppe was a world-historical event. The closure of the steppe frontier meant the end of an age of fluidity, ecumenical exchange, fighting, and shifting of boundaries, and the division, dispersal, and extermination of the Mongols, who are now scattered from the Volga river to North China, one of the widest involuntary diasporas to occur on the continent. The outcome was the bipolar division of Central Asia between two empires, marked by a border delimited in treaty negotiations between the Chinese and the Russians. The bipolar division effectively lasted from 1760 until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Outer Mongolia, despite proclaiming its independence in 1911, became a Soviet satellite under Red Army occupation in 1921.1 The division persists conceptually in the terminology generally used to describe the broad, physiographically unbounded region lying between

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07075332.1998.9640823

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Perdue, P. C.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Perdue, Peter C.
Venue
The International History Review
Published
1998-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
263-286
ISSN
  • 0707-5332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-6540
OpenAlex
W2050590601
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International History Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
Qing dynasty, Russian Empire, Muscovite expansion, Central Eurasia, steppe frontier, imperial boundaries, Outer Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibet, nomadic empires, early modern empires, 17th-18th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundaries, Maps, and Movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian Empires in Early Modern Central Eurasia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07075332.1998.9640823
The paper
Perdue, P. C. (1998). Boundaries, Maps, and Movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian Empires in Early Modern Central Eurasia. The International History Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.1998.9640823