Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low- and high-achieving students

Thanh Pham, Thi Hong·2013·Higher Education Research & Development
DOI 10.1080/07294360.2013.806436
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions, interactions and behaviours of different-ability college students when they worked on different types of assessments. Two classes of 145 Vietnamese college students participated in this three-month study. The students were assigned to mixed-ability groups, each of which consisted of five students. The results show that assessment designed as a group project helped close the gap in communication and interactions between different-ability students within groups. When the students engaged with assessment as a group project, all levels of performers increased productive learning behaviours and provided more relevant verbal help and assistance to each other. Importantly, this type of assessment created various opportunities for the low performers to participate in, and make a contribution to, group tasks. As a result, all group members became interested in working with others. They perceived cooperative learning groups as being enjoyable and fun.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2013.806436

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Allan, S.D. (1991). Ability grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping and the gifted? Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60–65.
  2. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x · DOI
  3. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman.
  4. 10.3102/00346543064001001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/03075077912331377131 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137 · DOI
  7. 10.1163/9789460910562 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0959-4752(96)00002-3 · DOI
  9. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, J. (2005). Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  10. 10.2190/T26C-3FTH-RNYP-TV30 · DOI
  11. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In SharanS. (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research, (pp. 173–202). New York: Praeger.
  12. 10.2307/2943877 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF03025835 · DOI
  14. Luu, T.T. (2010). Infusing cooperative learning into an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 64–75.
  15. Messier, P.W. (2005). Traditional teaching strategies versus cooperative teaching strategies: Which can improve achievement scores in Chinese middle schools?. US-China Education Review, 2(1), 1–10.
  16. 10.1080/00220671.1994.9941255 · DOI
  17. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  18. Phuong-Mai, N. (2008). Culture and cooperation: Cooperative learning in Asian Confucian heritage cultures – The case of Viet Nam. Utrecht, the Netherlands: IVLOS Institute of Education of Utrecht University.
  19. Robinson, G.E. (1990). Synthesis of research on class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80–90.
  20. 10.1177/0193841X8500900505 · DOI
  21. 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001 · DOI
  23. Thanh-Pham, T.H., Gillies, R.M., & Renshaw, P. (2011). Designing strategies to make cooperative learning culturally appropriate in the Vietnamese context. Higher Education Review, 44(1), 43–57.
  24. Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on process and effects of cooperation between primary school children. The Netherlands: Groningen: University of Groningen.
  25. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  26. Webb, N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summery. In SlavinR.SharanS.KaganS. (Ed.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, (pp. 5–15). New York: Plenum.
  27. 10.3102/00346543052003421 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thanh Pham, T. H.
Affiliations
,
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08-27
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
993-1006
ISSN
  • 0729-4360
  • 1469-8366
DOI
10.1080/07294360.2013.806436
Cited by
5
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.