Cited by 20Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentGlobal Education Systems and PoliciesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The role of transnational networking for higher education academics

Open access
Wakefield, Kelly, Dismore, Harriet·2015·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

Amidst rapid socio-economic change, higher education (HE) academics across the world face major challenges to its organisation, finance and management. This paper discusses the role of transnational networking in higher education. Data from 40 interviews with geographically distributed academics engaged in learning and teaching transnational networks (TNNs) were analysed. The findings show that in an increasingly globalised higher education system, transnational networking goes beyond conference attendance to entail multiple combinations of offline and online activities. We do not think that current concepts of communities of practice or networks of practice accurately describe these phenomena. Instead, we suggest that these activities entail different and varying levels of tangibility, more accurately defined by us as TNNs. Moreover, we argue that the term ‘network’ in this context facilitates the individualistic pursuit of a career increasingly essential in a pressurised higher education environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024630

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The networking behaviors and support structures for doctoral students remain an under-researched area.

    “However, the networking behaviors and support structures for doctoral students remain an under researched area (Goel & Grimpe, 2013;Wakefield & Dismore, 2015).”

    From Academic Conferences as Learning Sites: A Multinational Comparison of Doctoral Students’ Perspectives and Institutional Policy (2019) · cites this paper as Wakefield & Dismore, 2015

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says few studies have examined how individual academics engage in and experience networks, and Networked individualism (page unavailable) says studies of academic networks have been limited in scope. Those passages support a research gap concerning academics’ networking, but they do not establish that doctoral students’ networking behaviors or support structures are under-researched. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Alemdaroglu, A. (2011) Selling Futures Across Borders: The Global Trade of Higher Education and 'For-profitization' in Turkey. Anthropology Brown Bag Series, Stanford University, USA. Retrieved March 2014 from https://www.academia.edu/2131458/Selling_Futures_across_Borders_The_Global_Trad
  2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V. & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77.
  3. Bath, D. & Smith, C. (2004). Academic Developers: An Academic Tribe Claiming their Territory in Higher Education. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 9-27.
  4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and The Open University Press.
  5. Bhandari, R. & Blumenthal, P. (2008). The Europa World of Learning. London: Routledge.
  6. Boland, R.J., & Tenkasi, R.V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organisation Science 6(4), 350-372.
  7. Bowen, H., Schuster, J. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information (2nd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School.
  9. Buchbinder, H. & Newson, J. (1985). 'The academic work process, the professoriate and unionization'. In C. Watson (Ed.), The professoriate -occupation in crisis. Toronto: Higher Education Group, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  10. Castells, M. (1996, 1998) The Rise of the Network Society, Volume 1 The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Blackwell, Oxford.
  11. Castells, M. (2001) The Internet Galaxy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  12. Castells, M. (2009) Communication Power. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  13. Chua, V. (2013). Contextualising 'networked individualism': the interplay of social categories, role relationships and tasks. Current Sociology 6(5-6), 602-625.
  14. Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal 34(3), 329-45.
  15. Clegg, S. (2010). Time Future -the dominant discourse of higher education. Time and Society 19(3), 345-364.
  16. Cox, A. M. (2007) Beyond information: factors in participation in networks of practice, a case study of web management in UK Higher Education. Journal of Documentation, 63(5), 765-787
  17. Dewsbury, J. & Naylor, S. (2002). Practising geographical knowledge: fields, bodies and dissemination, AREA 34(3), 253-260.
  18. Dubé, L., Bourhis, A. & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a Typology of Virtual Communities of Practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1, 69-93.
  19. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
  20. Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension. London: Free Press.
  21. Findlay, A., King, R., Stam, A. & Ruiz-Gelices, E. (2005). International Opportunities: Searching for the Meaning of Student Migration, Geographica Helvetica, 60(3), 192- 200.
  22. Fox, S. (2000). Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Theory. Journal of Management Studies 37(6), 853-868.
  23. Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and practice: the mediating discourse. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of Action Research: the concise paperback edition (17-26).
  24. Hager, P. & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning, British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 619-638.
  25. Hodkinson, H. & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving school teachers' workplace learning, Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109-131.
  26. Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2006) Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
  27. Johnson, P. (2008). INDUCTIVE ANALYSIS. In R. Thorpe, & R. Holt (Eds.), The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. (pp. 113-116). London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857020109. · DOI
  28. Kahn, P., Goodhew, P., Murphy, M. & Walsh, L. (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning as collaborative working: a case study in shared practice and collective purpose. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 901-914.
  29. Kim, T. (2008). Transnational academic mobility in a global knowledge economy. In D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi & S. Wright (Eds.). The World Yearbook of Education 2008: Geographies of knowledge and geometries of power: Framing the future of higher education (pp. 319-337). London: Routledge.
  30. Kim, T. (2010). Transnational academic mobility, knowledge, and identity capital. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 577-591.
  31. Kligyte, G. & Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: leading us into fantasy -the paradox resilience of collegiality in academic leadership. Higher Education Research & Development 33(1), 157-169.
  32. Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513-525.
  33. Jöns, H. (2009). 'Brain circulation' and transnational knowledge networks: studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954-2000, Global Networks, 9(3), 315-338.
  34. Jöns, H. (2011). Transnational Academic Mobility and Gender. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 183-209.
  35. Larsen, J., Axhausen, K. & Urry, J. (2006). Geographies of Social Networks: Meetings, Travel and Communications. Mobilities, 1(2), 261-283.
  36. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. McCormick, R., Carmichael, P., Fox, A. & Procter, R. (2010). Researching and Understanding Educational Networks. London: Taylor & Francis.
  39. Mellor, J., Ingram, N., Abrahams, J. & Beedel, P. (2014). Class matters in the interview setting? Positionality, situatedness and class. British Educational Research Journal 40(1), 135-149.
  40. Millen, D. R., Fontaine, M. & Muller, M. (2002). Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Communities of Practice. Communications of the ACM, 45(4). Retrieved March 2014 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=505276&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=2233583
  41. Ng, L. & Pemberton, J. (2013). Research-based communities of practice in UK higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1522-1539.
  42. Pataraia, N., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I. & Littlejohn. A. (2013). How and what do academics learn through their personal networks? Journal of Further and Higher Education. Retrieved March 2014 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831041 · DOI
  43. Rainie, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: the new social operating system. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
  44. Rainbird, H., Munro, A. & Holly, L. (2004). The Employment Relationship and Workplace Learning. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller and A. Munro (Eds). Workplace Learning in Context, (pp. 38-54) London: Routledge.
  45. Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a World Economy, (2nd ed). Pine Forge Press, London.
  46. Sassen, S. (2002) Global Networks, Linked Cities. Routledge, New York.
  47. Scott, J. (2011). Conceptualising the Social World. Principles of Sociological Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Stewart, D. (2003). Status Mobility and Status Stability in a Community of Free Software Developers. Academy of Management Proceedings. Retrieved March 2014 from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/proceedings/13792424/status-mobility-status- stability-community-free-software-developers
  49. Swan, J., Newell, S. & Robertson, M. (1999). Central agencies in the diffusion and design of technology: a comparison of the UK and Sweden. Organization Studies, 20(6), 905-931.
  50. Tagliaventi, M. R. & Mattarelli, E. (2006). The role of networks of practice, value sharing and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups. Human Relations, 59, pp. 291-319.
  51. Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organisation Science 16(2), 151-64.
  52. Turner, R., Brown, T. & Edwards-Jones, A. (2013). Writing my first academic article feels like dancing around naked: research development for higher education lecturers working in further education colleges. International Journal for Academic Development. Retrieved March 2014 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1360144X.2013.792729 · DOI
  53. Vähäsantanen, K. & Saarinen, J. (2012). The power dance in the research interview: manifesting power and powerlessness. Qualitative Research. Available at http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/08/10/1468794112451036.abstract
  54. Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S. & Teigland, R. (2004). Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11-12), 493-513.
  55. Wayne, S., Shore, L. & Liden, R. (1997). Perceived organisational support and leader member exchange: a social exchange perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
  56. Weinberg, A. & Graham-Smith, G. (2012). Collegiality: can it survive the corporate university? Social Dynamics: A Journal of African Studies, 38(1), 68-86.
  57. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  58. Whelan, E. (2007). Exploring knowledge exchange in electronic networks of practice. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 5-12.
  59. Winchester, H. P. M. (1996) Ethical issues in interviewing as a research method in human geography. Australian Geographer, 27(1), 117-131.
  60. Witt, S. F., Sykes, A. M. & Dartus, M. (1995) Forecasting International Conference Attendance. Tourism Management, 16(8), 559-570.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakefield, K., & Dismore, H.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Dismore, Harriet
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2015-04-24
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1296
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
OpenAlex
W2028821871
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education Systems and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
transnational networking, higher education academics, communities of practice, networks of practice, academic careers, globalization of higher education, academic professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review