Cited by 102Innovative Teaching MethodsEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours

Open access
White, Paul J., Larson, Ian, Styles, Kim, Yuriev, Elizabeth, Evans, Darrell R., Rangachari, P.K., Short, Jennifer L., Exintaris, Betty +5 more·2016·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

The conventional lecture has significant limitations in the higher education context, often leading to a passive learning experience for students. This paper reports a process of transforming teaching and learning with active learning strategies in a research-intensive educational context across a faculty of 45 academic staff and more than 1000 students. A phased approach was used, involving nine staff in a pilot phase during which a common vision and principles were developed. In short, our approach was to mandate a move away from didactic lectures to classes that involved students interacting with content, with each other and with instructors in order to attain domain-specific learning outcomes and generic skills. After refinement, an implementation phase commenced within all first-year subjects, involving 12 staff including three from the pilot group. The staff use of active learning methods in classes increased by sixfold and sevenfold in the pilot and implementation phases, respectively. An analysis of implementation phase exam questions indicated that staff increased their use of questions addressing higher order cognitive skills by 51%. Results of a staff survey indicated that this change in practice was caused by the involvement of staff in the active learning approach. Fifty-six percent of staff respondents indicated that they had maintained constructive alignment as they introduced active learning. After the pilot, only three out of nine staff agreed that they understood what makes for an effective active learning exercise. This rose to seven out of nine staff at the completion of the implementation phase. The development of a common approach with explicit vision and principles and the evaluation and refinement of active learning were effective elements of our transformational change management strategy. Future efforts will focus on ensuring that all staff have the time, skills and pedagogical understanding required to embed constructively aligned active learning within the approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107887

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 102

Authors
White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Rangachari, P. K., Short, J. L., Exintaris, B., Malone, D. T., Davie, B., Eise, N., Mc Namara, K., & Naidu, S.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
White, Paul J.
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2015-11-18
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
619-633
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
OpenAlex
W2283464363
Cited by
102
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
29.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
active learning, teaching transformation, research universities, academic staff attitudes, didactic lectures, higher-order thinking skills, first-year teaching, employee development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review