Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours
Open accessAbstract
The conventional lecture has significant limitations in the higher education context, often leading to a passive learning experience for students. This paper reports a process of transforming teaching and learning with active learning strategies in a research-intensive educational context across a faculty of 45 academic staff and more than 1000 students. A phased approach was used, involving nine staff in a pilot phase during which a common vision and principles were developed. In short, our approach was to mandate a move away from didactic lectures to classes that involved students interacting with content, with each other and with instructors in order to attain domain-specific learning outcomes and generic skills. After refinement, an implementation phase commenced within all first-year subjects, involving 12 staff including three from the pilot group. The staff use of active learning methods in classes increased by sixfold and sevenfold in the pilot and implementation phases, respectively. An analysis of implementation phase exam questions indicated that staff increased their use of questions addressing higher order cognitive skills by 51%. Results of a staff survey indicated that this change in practice was caused by the involvement of staff in the active learning approach. Fifty-six percent of staff respondents indicated that they had maintained constructive alignment as they introduced active learning. After the pilot, only three out of nine staff agreed that they understood what makes for an effective active learning exercise. This rose to seven out of nine staff at the completion of the implementation phase. The development of a common approach with explicit vision and principles and the evaluation and refinement of active learning were effective elements of our transformational change management strategy. Future efforts will focus on ensuring that all staff have the time, skills and pedagogical understanding required to embed constructively aligned active learning within the approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
White et al. also found that it was important to use ChatGPT in conjunction with other resources, such as human tutors and textbooks.
“However, they also found that it was important to use ChatGPT in conjunction with other resources, such as human tutors and textbooks.”
From ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
White et al. reported students who used ChatGPT for an English composition course found that it helped generate ideas and get feedback on their writing.
“White et al. [26] reported students who used ChatGPT for an English composition course found that it helped generate ideas and get feedback on their writing.”
From ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Rangachari, P. K., Short, J. L., Exintaris, B., Malone, D. T., Davie, B., Eise, N., Mc Namara, K., & Naidu, S.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- White, Paul J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 619-633
- ISSN
- 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8366
- OpenAlex
- W2283464363
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- active learning, teaching transformation, research universities, academic staff attitudes, didactic lectures, higher-order thinking skills, first-year teaching, employee development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review