Cited by 22Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsInnovative Education and Learning PracticesPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Doctoral students as journal editors: non‐formal learning through academic work

Hopwood, Nick·2010·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to formal pedagogic elements of the doctorate – supervision and other structured institutional provisions – but we know less about the role played by non‐formal practices in doctoral students’ learning. This paper explores the experiences of eight doctoral students involved in editing student‐run journals. Editorship and reviewing manuscripts are presented as part of academic service – important yet overlooked aspects of academic work, which may be opaque to doctoral students. The analysis draws on concepts relating to workplace learning to understand what these student editors learned and how they learned it. It also pays explicit attention to learners’ prior learning and experiences and the role these played in their editorial work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360903532032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopwood, N.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hopwood, Nick
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2010-04-23
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
319-331
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
OpenAlex
W2044010890
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
doctoral students, student-run journals, journal editing, non-formal learning, workplace learning, academic services, peer review, prior learning, doctoral education, doctoral supervision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review