Doctoral students as journal editors: non‐formal learning through academic work
Abstract
Much attention has been paid to formal pedagogic elements of the doctorate – supervision and other structured institutional provisions – but we know less about the role played by non‐formal practices in doctoral students’ learning. This paper explores the experiences of eight doctoral students involved in editing student‐run journals. Editorship and reviewing manuscripts are presented as part of academic service – important yet overlooked aspects of academic work, which may be opaque to doctoral students. The analysis draws on concepts relating to workplace learning to understand what these student editors learned and how they learned it. It also pays explicit attention to learners’ prior learning and experiences and the role these played in their editorial work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This finding concurs with Hopwood's (2010) and Barnacle and Mewburn's (2010) findings about the importance of non-formal learning spaces.
“This finding concurs with Hopwood's (2010) and Barnacle and Mewburn's (2010) findings about the importance of non-formal learning spaces.”
From Academic Conferences as Learning Sites: A Multinational Comparison of Doctoral Students’ Perspectives and Institutional Policy (2019) · cites this paper as Hopwood's (2010)
Cites
Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career
Austin, A. E. (2002) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0001 · Cited by 1,347 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fakunle, O., Dollinger, M., Alla-Mensah, J., & Izard, B. (2019) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4383 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hopwood, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hopwood, Nick
- ORCID
- Hopwood, Nick
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-23
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-331
- ISSN
- 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8366
- OpenAlex
- W2044010890
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- doctoral students, student-run journals, journal editing, non-formal learning, workplace learning, academic services, peer review, prior learning, doctoral education, doctoral supervision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review