CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differences in diet and food habits between patients with gallstones and controls.

Ortega, R M, Fernández-Azuela, M, Encinas-Sotillos, A, Andrés, P, López-Sobaler, A M·1997·Journal of the American College of Nutrition
DOI 10.1080/07315724.1997.10718655
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To compare the food, energy, macronutrient and micronutrient intake of patients with gallstones to those of a control group of similar demographic characteristics. Design Patient-control study. Subjects 54 gallstone patients and 46 control subjects. Methods Two 24-hour dietary recalls and a "food frequency intake" questionnaire were obtained from patients and controls. In both groups, the presence/absence of gallstones was confirmed by ultrasonography. Participants answered a questionnaire on their physical activity patterns. Results Gallstone patients consumed less food per day (g/day) and less fish and fruits than did control subjects. They also showed greater intakes of cereals, oils, sugars and meats than did control subjects and ate fewer meals per day, tending to omit evening snacks and more substantial evening meals. Further, patients spent less time walking and slept more than did control subjects. They also experienced fluctuations in body weight with greater frequency. Patients consumed more total calories (energy) and fats (especially monounsaturated fatty acids and saturated fatty acids), and less fiber, folate and magnesium than did control subjects. Women with gallstones were shown to have significantly higher intakes of total fats, monounsaturated fatty acids, saturated fatty acids and cholesterol, and significantly lower intakes of fiber, folate, magnesium, calcium and vitamin C than control women. For all vitamins and minerals studied, patients show…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.1997.10718655

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight loss induced after bariatric surgery initiates biliary sludge and gallstones in 30% of cases during the 6-month period after gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion.

    “weight loss induced after bariatric surgery has been reported to initiate biliary sludge (composed of precipitated lipid particles such as aggregated crystals or microliths) and gallstones in 30% of cases during the 6-month period after receiving a gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion [30,31].”

    From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

  • A higher dose of UDCA has not shown greater benefits in patients receiving gastric bypass.

    “A higher dose has not shown greater benefits either, as illustrated in a randomized trial in patients receiving gastric bypass [31].”

    From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. National Research Council, 1989, “Diet and Health. Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk.”
  2. Teres J, Litiasis Biliar. Medicine (Ed. esp), 6, 375
  3. Jorgensen T, 1992, Nord Med, 107, 122
  4. Carey MC, 1993, Am J Surg, 165, 410, 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80932-8 · DOI
  5. Trautwein EA, 1994, Z Emahrungswiss, 33, 2, 10.1007/BF01610574 · DOI
  6. Calpena R, 1988, Rev Esp Enf Ap Digest, 74, 25
  7. Lee SP, 1988, “Nutrition and Metabolism in Patient Care.”, 13
  8. Yang H, Petersen GM, Roth MP, Schoenfield U, Marks JW: Risk factors for gallstone formation during rapid loss of weight. Dig Dis Sci 37,912–918, 1992. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Frohlich ED, 1988, Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers: Report of a special task force appointed by the steering Committee American Heart Association
  10. Dalloso HM, 1988, J Epidemiol Commun Health, 42, 121, 10.1136/jech.42.2.121 · DOI
  11. Instituto de Nutrición (CSIC), 1994, Tablas de Composición de Alimentos Espanñoles
  12. Departamento de Nutrición, 1994, “Ingestas Recomendadas de Energía y Nutrientes para la Población Española. Madrid: Departamento de Nutrición
  13. Black AE, 1991, Eur J Clin Nutr, 45, 583
  14. Ortega RM, 1995, Ann Nutr Metab, 39, 371, 10.1159/000177887 · DOI
  15. Johnson RK, 1994, Am J Clin Nutr, 59, 1286, 10.1093/ajcn/59.6.1286 · DOI
  16. Wonnacott HW, 1977, “Introductory Statistics.”
  17. Gonzalez J, 1993, Med Clin (Barcelona), 101, 41
  18. Simon JA, 1993, Med Hypotheses, 40, 81, 10.1016/0306-9877(93)90132-A · DOI
  19. Abdel Rahman HA, 1993, J Egypt Public Health Assoc, 68, 205
  20. Barbara L, 1987, Hepatology, 7, 913, 10.1002/hep.1840070520 · DOI
  21. Encinas-Sotillos A, Rev Esp Enf Ap Digest
  22. Hofmann AF, 1993, Am J Surg, 165, 541, 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80958-4 · DOI
  23. Sichieri R, 1991, Am J Public Health, 81, 880, 10.2105/AJPH.81.7.880 · DOI
  24. Kato I, Nomura A, Stemmermann GN, Chyou PH: Prospective study of clinical gallbladder and its association with obesity, physical activity, and other factors. Dig Dis Sci 37,784–790, 1992. · DOI
  25. Licata G, 1994, Ann It Med Int, 9, 29
  26. Capron JP, 1981, Br Med J, 283, 1435, 10.1136/bmj.283.6304.1435 · DOI
  27. Ortega RM, 1994, Int J Food Sci Nutr, 46, 137, 10.3109/09637489509012541 · DOI
  28. Pastides H, 1990, Arch Intern Med, 150, 1409, 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390190073010 · DOI
  29. Diehl AI, 1989, Gastroenterology, 97, 1227, 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90399-5 · DOI
  30. Moerman CJ, 1994, Ann Epidemiol, 4, 248, 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90104-X · DOI
  31. Pixley F, 1988, Gut, 29, 1511, 10.1136/gut.29.11.1511 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ortega, R. M., Fernández-Azuela, M., Encinas-Sotillos, A., Andrés, P., & López-Sobaler, A. M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1997-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
88-95
ISSN
  • 0731-5724
  • 1541-1087
DOI
10.1080/07315724.1997.10718655
Cited by
61
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review