Cited by 164Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Comparison of a Very Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diet on Fasting Lipids, LDL Subclasses, Insulin Resistance, and Postprandial Lipemic Responses in Overweight Women

Open access
Volek, Jeff S., Sharman, Matthew J., Gómez, Ana L., DiPasquale, Chris, Roti, Melissa, Pumerantz, Amy, Kraemer, William J.·2004·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

Objective Very low-carbohydrate diets are widely used for weight loss yet few controlled studies have determined how these diets impact cardiovascular risk factors compared to more traditional low-fat weight loss diets. The primary purpose of this study was to compare a very low-carbohydrate and a low-fat diet on fasting blood lipids, LDL subclasses, postprandial lipemia, and insulin resistance in overweight and obese women. Methods Thirteen normolipidemic, moderately overweight (body fat >30%) women were prescribed two hypocaloric (-500 kcal/day) diets for 4 week periods, a very low-carbohydrate ( Results Compared to corresponding values after the very low-carbohydrate diet, fasting total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C were significantly (p Conclusions Compared to a low-fat weight loss diet, a short-term very low-carbohydrate diet did not lower LDL-C but did prevent the decline in HDL-C and resulted in improved insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese, but otherwise healthy women. Small decreases in body mass improved postprandial lipemia, and therefore cardiovascular risk, independent of diet composition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 164

Authors
Volek, J. S., Sharman, M. J., Gómez, A. L., DiPasquale, C., Roti, M., Pumerantz, A., & Kraemer, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Volek, Jeff S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2004-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
177-184
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2001026322
Cited by
164
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
very low carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, weight loss, overweight women, fasting lipids, LDL subclasses, insulin resistance, postprandial lipemia, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, hypocaloric diet, body mass
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Fasting, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Obesity, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review