Comparison of a Very Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diet on Fasting Lipids, LDL Subclasses, Insulin Resistance, and Postprandial Lipemic Responses in Overweight Women
Open accessAbstract
Objective Very low-carbohydrate diets are widely used for weight loss yet few controlled studies have determined how these diets impact cardiovascular risk factors compared to more traditional low-fat weight loss diets. The primary purpose of this study was to compare a very low-carbohydrate and a low-fat diet on fasting blood lipids, LDL subclasses, postprandial lipemia, and insulin resistance in overweight and obese women. Methods Thirteen normolipidemic, moderately overweight (body fat >30%) women were prescribed two hypocaloric (-500 kcal/day) diets for 4 week periods, a very low-carbohydrate ( Results Compared to corresponding values after the very low-carbohydrate diet, fasting total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C were significantly (p Conclusions Compared to a low-fat weight loss diet, a short-term very low-carbohydrate diet did not lower LDL-C but did prevent the decline in HDL-C and resulted in improved insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese, but otherwise healthy women. Small decreases in body mass improved postprandial lipemia, and therefore cardiovascular risk, independent of diet composition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An LDL-C increase is sometimes observed with carbohydrate restriction.
“and an LDL-C increase is sometimes observed (30–33).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Volek, J. S., Sharman, M. J., Gómez, A. L., DiPasquale, C., Roti, M., Pumerantz, A., & Kraemer, W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Volek, Jeff S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-184
- ISSN
- 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1087
- OpenAlex
- W2001026322
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- very low carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, weight loss, overweight women, fasting lipids, LDL subclasses, insulin resistance, postprandial lipemia, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, hypocaloric diet, body mass
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Fasting, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Obesity, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Metabolic Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review