Cited by 12Nutritional Studies and DietBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and Health

Effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Eating Plan on the Metabolic Side Effects of Corticosteroid Medications

Azadbakht, Leila, Izadi, Vajihe, Ehsani, Simin, Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad·2016·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

Objective We aimed to determine the effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on the metabolic side effects of corticosteroid medication use. Design A randomized clinical trial was undertaken in 60 patients on corticosteroid therapy for 10 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to a DASH or control diet. Carbohydrate, protein, and fat in both groups were 50-60%, 15-20%, 30%, respectively. DASH diet was a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, and low in total and saturated fat and cholesterol, refined grains, and also sweets. Fasting blood samples were collected to determine blood glucose and lipid profile. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were measured based on the standard guidelines. Results The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 31.1 ± 3.6 year and 26.9 ± 2.6 kg/m(2), respectively. There were no significant differences between age and BMI in two groups at baseline. No significant difference was observed in body weight and waist circumference following the DASH diet compared to control diet. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly different following the DASH eating pattern (P = 0.04). Serum total cholesterol and fasting blood glucose significantly decreased in those following the DASH diet after adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusion The DASH diet had beneficial effects on several metabolic side effects among patients using corticosteroid medications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2014.991459

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calorie intake higher than 30 kcal/kg/day could favor corticosteroid-induced lipodystrophy during prolonged (>3 months) corticosteroid therapy.

    “Calorie intake higher than 30 kcal/kg/day could favor corticosteroid-induced lipodystrophy”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [163]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azadbakht, L., Izadi, V., Ehsani, S., & Esmaillzadeh, A.
Affiliations
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Azadbakht, Leila
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2015-12-09
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
285-290
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2193660023
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
DASH diet, corticosteroid therapy, metabolic side effects, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, body weight, waist circumference, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Edible Grain, Cholesterol, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Female, Fruit, Humans, Hypertension, Iran, Male, Vegetables, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review