Diagnosis of cancer is not a death sentence: Examining posttraumatic growth and its associated factors in cancer patients
Abstract
Objectives: Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is the experience of positive psychological growth as a result of struggle with highly challenging life crises. This study was conducted to investigate the degree of PTG and its associated factors, as well as to identify which positive psychological parameters most significantly associated with greater PTG among Malaysian cancer patients.Design, sample, & methods: This cross-sectional survey included 195 patients with different cancer diagnoses. Perceived spousal support, level of hope, level of optimism, and PTG were measured using various validated indexes.Findings: The total mean score for PTG Inventory-Short Form (PTGI-SF) was 39.87 (±9.09). Female gender, Islamic religious belief, and having higher level of hope and greater spousal support were associated with a higher PTGI-SF score, and the most significant predictor was the hope scale.Conclusions: Malaysian cancer patients exhibited a high level of PTG, and hope was the positive psychological factor which was most significantly associated with PTG.Implications for psychosocial providers: Psychosocial interventions that promote positive psychology should be included in the treatment for cancer patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hope is the most significant factor associated with greater posttraumatic growth among cancer patients compared with other positive psychology elements.
“Higher levels of hope are associated with better QoL and spiritual well-being for cancer patients, and it is the most significant factor associated with greater posttraumatic growth among cancer patients compared with other positive psychology elements [23–25].”
Higher levels of hope are associated with better quality of life and spiritual well-being for cancer patients.
“Higher levels of hope are associated with better QoL and spiritual well-being for cancer patients, and it is the most significant factor associated with greater posttraumatic growth among cancer patients compared with other positive psychology elements [23–25].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Leong Abdullah, M. F. I., Hami, R., Appalanaido, G. K., Azman, N., Mohd Shariff, N., & Md Sharif, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Lifestyle Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia;
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 636-651
- ISSN
- 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7586
- OpenAlex
- W2918597154
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, cancer patients, hope, optimism, spousal support, gender differences, positive psychology, psychosocial interventions
- MeSH terms
- Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Hope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review