The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Post-Selection Inference for Generalized Linear Models With Many Controls
Abstract
Alexandre Bellonia, Victor Chernozhukovb & Ying Weica The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 ()b Dept. of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 ()c Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032 ()Color versions of one or more of the figures in the article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/r/jbes.This article considers generalized linear models in the presence of many controls. We lay out a general methodology to estimate an effect of interest based on the construction of an instrument that immunizes against model selection mistakes and apply it to the case of logistic binary choice model. More specifically we propose new methods for estimating and constructing confidence regions for a regression parameter of primary interest α0, a parameter in front of the regressor of interest, such as the treatment variable or a policy variable. These methods allow to estimate α0 at the root-n rate when the total number p of other regressors, called controls, potentially exceeds the sample size n using sparsity assumptions. The sparsity assumption means that there is a subset of s < n controls, which suffices to accurately approximate the nuisance part of the regression function. Importantly, the estimators and these resulting confidence regions are valid uniformly over s-sparse models satisfying s2log 2p = o(n) and other technical conditions. These procedures do not rely on traditional consistent model selection arguments for their validity. In fact, they are robust with respect to moderate model selection mistakes in variable selection. Under suitable conditions, the estimators are semi-parametrically efficient in the sense of attaining the semi-parametric efficiency bounds for the class of models in this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters
Newey, W. K., Hansen, C., Duflo, E., Robins, J., Chernozhukov, V., Demirer, M., & Chetverikov, D. (2017) · doi:10.1920/wp.cem.2017.2817 · Cited by 486
Self-citationDebiased machine learning of conditional average treatment effects and other causal functions
Semenova, V., & Chernozhukov, V. (2021) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utaa027 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Wei, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-09-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 606-619
- ISSN
- 0735-0015 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2707
- OpenAlex
- W2308122693
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-Selection Inference for Generalized Linear Models With Many Controls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07350015.2016.1166116
- The paper
- Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Wei, Y. (2016). Post-Selection Inference for Generalized Linear Models With Many Controls. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1166116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.