The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant Cell Wall Remodelling in the Rhizobium–Legume Symbiosis
Abstract
Colonization of host cells by rhizobium bacteria involves the progressive remodelling of the plant–microbial interface. Following induction of nodulation genes by legume-derived flavonoid signals, rhizobium secretes Nod-factors (lipochitin oligosaccharides) that cause root hair deformations by perturbing the growth of the plant cell wall. The infection thread arises as a tubular ingrowth bounded by plant cell wall. This serves as a conduit for colonizing bacterial cells that grow and divide in its lumen. The transcellular orientation of thread growth is controlled by the cytoskeleton and is coupled to cell cycle reactivation and cell division processes. In response to rhizobium infection, host cells synthesize several new components (early nodulins) that modify the properties of the cell wall and extracellular matrix. Root nodule extensins are a legume-specific family of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins targeted into the lumen of the infection thread. They have alternating extensin and arabinogalactan (AGP) glycosylation motifs. The structural characteristics of these glycoproteins suggest that they may serve to regulate fluid-to-solid transitions in the extracellular matrix. Extensibility of the infection thread is apparently controlled by peroxide-driven protein cross-linking and perhaps also by modification of the pectic matrix. Endocytosis of rhizobia from unwalled infection droplets into the host cell cytoplasm depends on physical contact between glycocalyx components of the plant and bacterial membrane surfaces. As endosymbionts, bacteroids remain enclosed within a plant-derived membrane that is topologically equivalent to the plasma membrane. This membrane acquires specialist functions that regulate metabolite exchanges between bacterial cells and the host cytoplasm. Ultimately, however, the fate of the symbiosome is to become a lysosome, causing the eventual senescence of the symbiotic interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium–Medicago model
Jones, K. M., Kobayashi, H., Davies, B. W., Taga, M. E., & Walker, G. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1705 · Cited by 937
Fate map of Medicago truncatula root nodules
Xiao, T. T., Schilderink, S., Moling, S., Deinum, E. E., Kondorosi, E., Franssen, H., Kulikova, O., Niebel, A., & Bisseling, T. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.110775 · Cited by 326
The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses
Vocciante, M., Grifoni, M., Fusini, D., Petruzzelli, G., & Franchi, E. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031231 · Cited by 316
Libault, M., Farmer, A., Brechenmacher, L., Drnevich, J., Langley, R. J., Bilgin, D. D., Radwan, O., Neece, D. J., Clough, S. J., May, G. D., et al. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.148379 · Cited by 310
Invasion by Invitation: Rhizobial Infection in Legumes
Murray, J. D. (2011) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-08-10-0181 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewin, N. J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-316
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2086893545
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Cell Wall Remodelling in the Rhizobium–Legume Symbiosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680490480734
- The paper
- Brewin, N. J. (2004). Plant Cell Wall Remodelling in the Rhizobium–Legume Symbiosis. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490480734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.