The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management
Abstract
Management of soilborne pests and diseases in cropping systems is often highly challenging—in implementation of acceptable methodologies and in dealing with secondary problems. The phase-out of methyl bromide brings this into particularly sharp focus. There is a need for diversified options and alternatives to fill different roles across the soilborne pest and disease management spectrum, but flexibility is limited, as practicalities demand that they fit into a prophylactic methodology. It is against such a backdrop that expectations and promotion of alternatives must be set. There is also a need to recognize potentially serious problems that may have been masked under historical management regimes, but for which the nature of the system offers little scope to avoid or manage. Biofumigation is the beneficial use of Brassica green manures that release isothiocyanates chemically similar to methyl isothiocyanate, the active agent from the synthetic fumigant metam sodium, which is used as a substitute for methyl bromide in some systems. A systematic approach to research into biofumigation, specifically aimed at overcoming a long history of empiricism, has seen significant recent advances in both basic and applied knowledge. A key development has been achievement of maximal biofumigation potential through greatly enhanced release of appropriate isothiocyanates into soil. These advances have led to commercial adoption, demonstrating that biofumigation, when applied to appropriate production systems, can have efficacy and offer cost savings. Crucially, these systematically derived research and development findings and their adoption now provide the impetus for self-sustaining further development and market penetration of the concept. Despite this success, biofumigation is not seen as being sufficiently powerful or practical in implementation to be an alternative to methyl bromide on a broad scale and misdirection in that regard could be counterproductive to more appropriately targeted further development. Enhanced microbial biodegradation is a cryptic phenomenon that can diminish the efficacy of soil-applied pesticides, including isothiocyanates and most other currently available methyl bromide substitutes. Because methyl bromide is not susceptible, the phenomenon has potentially serious implications in intensive production systems switching from methyl bromide to reliance on other compounds that are. It is an intractable problem once induced. Avoidance of its onset is the only feasible management strategy. This has been aided for some particularly vulnerable environments by recent clarification of key risk factors associated with soil type, soil pH, and calcium content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accelerated degradation of methyl isothiocyanate in soil
Dungan, R. S., Gan, J., & Yates, S. R. (2003) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1023/a:1022092907878 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Diversity, Pathogenicity, and Management of Verticillium Species
Klosterman, S. J., Atallah, Z. K., Vallad, G. E., & Subbarao, K. V. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081748 · Cited by 774
Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments—A review
Oka, Y. (2010) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.003 · Cited by 608
Drakopoulos, D., Kägi, A., Six, J., Zorn, A., Wettstein, F. E., Bucheli, T. D., Forrer, H.-R., & Vogelgsang, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198 · Cited by 35
Rudolph, R. E., Zasada, I. A., Hesse, C., & DeVetter, L. W. (2019) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.024 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthiessen, J. N., & Kirkegaard, J. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-265
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2096699217
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680600611543
- The paper
- Matthiessen, J. N., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2006). Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600611543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.