Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management

Matthiessen, John N., Kirkegaard, John A.·2006·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

Management of soilborne pests and diseases in cropping systems is often highly challenging—in implementation of acceptable methodologies and in dealing with secondary problems. The phase-out of methyl bromide brings this into particularly sharp focus. There is a need for diversified options and alternatives to fill different roles across the soilborne pest and disease management spectrum, but flexibility is limited, as practicalities demand that they fit into a prophylactic methodology. It is against such a backdrop that expectations and promotion of alternatives must be set. There is also a need to recognize potentially serious problems that may have been masked under historical management regimes, but for which the nature of the system offers little scope to avoid or manage. Biofumigation is the beneficial use of Brassica green manures that release isothiocyanates chemically similar to methyl isothiocyanate, the active agent from the synthetic fumigant metam sodium, which is used as a substitute for methyl bromide in some systems. A systematic approach to research into biofumigation, specifically aimed at overcoming a long history of empiricism, has seen significant recent advances in both basic and applied knowledge. A key development has been achievement of maximal biofumigation potential through greatly enhanced release of appropriate isothiocyanates into soil. These advances have led to commercial adoption, demonstrating that biofumigation, when applied to appropriate production systems, can have efficacy and offer cost savings. Crucially, these systematically derived research and development findings and their adoption now provide the impetus for self-sustaining further development and market penetration of the concept. Despite this success, biofumigation is not seen as being sufficiently powerful or practical in implementation to be an alternative to methyl bromide on a broad scale and misdirection in that regard could be counterproductive to more appropriately targeted further development. Enhanced microbial biodegradation is a cryptic phenomenon that can diminish the efficacy of soil-applied pesticides, including isothiocyanates and most other currently available methyl bromide substitutes. Because methyl bromide is not susceptible, the phenomenon has potentially serious implications in intensive production systems switching from methyl bromide to reliance on other compounds that are. It is an intractable problem once induced. Avoidance of its onset is the only feasible management strategy. This has been aided for some particularly vulnerable environments by recent clarification of key risk factors associated with soil type, soil pH, and calcium content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07352680600611543

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Matthiessen, J. N., & Kirkegaard, J. A.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
2006-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
235-265
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W2096699217
Cited by
473
References
1
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680600611543
The paper
Matthiessen, J. N., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2006). Biofumigation and Enhanced Biodegradation: Opportunity and Challenge in Soilborne Pest and Disease Management. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600611543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.