Cited by 254Bioenergy crop production and managementAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques

Industrial Hemp: Renewed Opportunities for an Ancient Crop

Fike, John·2016·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) has been a species of value to humans for much of our history given its broad adaptation and multiple uses. The plant is thought to have originated in Eurasia but has been carried to much of the rest of the world, largely for use as a fiber crop. Declining needs for fiber and competition from other plant fiber sources began to reduce demands for hemp. In turn, concern over psychotropically potent forms of hemp (i.e., marijuana) would lead to the crop's effective prohibition during much of the 20th century. Growing recognition of the many uses for hemp beyond the traditional rope, cordage, and canvas has helped revive interest in the crop, and a majority of US states have reduced restrictions to allow research with the plant. Although hemp now appears on the verge of returning to favor in the United States, there will be much to learn to make it a viable crop competitive with other commodities. Variety and photoperiodicity, site suitability, end use (grain, fiber, or dual purposes) and management, and the interactions of these factors will have a strong impact on crop productivity and suitability for post-harvest use. In addition, the harvest and processing technologies (particularly for fibers and essential oils) that are needed to optimize the plant's value are limited or lacking in the United States. Disease and pest issues are often considered of little concern for hemp, but these likely will grow as the plant's range expands. Opportunities for he…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07352689.2016.1257842

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fike, J.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Fike, John
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
2016-11
Volume
35
Issue
5-6
Pages
406-424
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W2569270723
Cited by
254
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Keywords
industrial hemp, Cannabis sativa, hemp fiber, hemp cultivation, hemp regulation, hemp varieties, photoperiodism, crop suitability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review