Cited by 187Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Ecology of Microbial Saprophytes and Pathogens in Tissue Culture and Field-Grown Plants: Reasons for Contamination Problems In Vitro

Leifert, Carlo, Morris, Cindy E., Waites, Will M.·1994·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

This review compares published surveys of microbial populations in plant tissue and cell cultures with the microbial saprophytes and pathogens found on field grown plants and microbial populations in the laboratory environment. From this comparison and the measured reduction in contamination after improvements in working practices in the laboratory, conclusions can be drawn about the importance of the explant and the laboratory as sources of contamination. Mechanisms of pathogenicity in vitro are described to explain why bacteria, fungi, and yeasts that are not pathogenic to plants in the field become pathogens in plant tissue cultures. Conversely, plant metabolism and its effect on the tissue culture environment are described to explain why prokaryotes, viruses, and viroids that cause disease in the field can stay latent in vitro. Detection methods for latent contaminants in plant tissue cultures are summarized, and the strategies and methods for prevention or treatment of contamination are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07352689409701912

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sources of in vitro contamination include culture containers, media, explants, equipment, the environment of the culture room and transfer area, and operating personnel.

    “Sources of in vitro contamination include culture containers, media, explants, equipment, the environment of the culture room and transfer area, and operating personnel.”
  • Several chemicals have been used to disinfect explants before culturing.

    “Several chemicals have been used to disinfect the explants before culturing [4].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leifert, C., Morris, C. E., & Waites, W. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Pathologie végétale (FR)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
1994-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
139-183
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W2063989396
Cited by
187
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
microbial contamination, plant tissue culture, plant cell culture, plant pathogens, explant contamination, laboratory contamination, latent viruses, viroids, plant viruses, contamination detection, contamination prevention, plant metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review