Ecology of Microbial Saprophytes and Pathogens in Tissue Culture and Field-Grown Plants: Reasons for Contamination Problems In Vitro
Abstract
This review compares published surveys of microbial populations in plant tissue and cell cultures with the microbial saprophytes and pathogens found on field grown plants and microbial populations in the laboratory environment. From this comparison and the measured reduction in contamination after improvements in working practices in the laboratory, conclusions can be drawn about the importance of the explant and the laboratory as sources of contamination. Mechanisms of pathogenicity in vitro are described to explain why bacteria, fungi, and yeasts that are not pathogenic to plants in the field become pathogens in plant tissue cultures. Conversely, plant metabolism and its effect on the tissue culture environment are described to explain why prokaryotes, viruses, and viroids that cause disease in the field can stay latent in vitro. Detection methods for latent contaminants in plant tissue cultures are summarized, and the strategies and methods for prevention or treatment of contamination are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sources of in vitro contamination include culture containers, media, explants, equipment, the environment of the culture room and transfer area, and operating personnel.
“Sources of in vitro contamination include culture containers, media, explants, equipment, the environment of the culture room and transfer area, and operating personnel.”
From A Fumigation-Based Surface Sterilization Approach for Plant Tissue Culture (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Several chemicals have been used to disinfect explants before culturing.
“Several chemicals have been used to disinfect the explants before culturing [4].”
From A Fumigation-Based Surface Sterilization Approach for Plant Tissue Culture (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Fumigation-Based Surface Sterilization Approach for Plant Tissue Culture
Sivanesan, I., Muthu, M., Gopal, J., Tasneem, S., Kim, D.-H., & Oh, J.-W. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052282 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Several chemicals have been used to disinfect the explants before culturing [4].”
- Authors
- Leifert, C., Morris, C. E., & Waites, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Pathologie végétale (FR)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-183
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2063989396
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- microbial contamination, plant tissue culture, plant cell culture, plant pathogens, explant contamination, laboratory contamination, latent viruses, viroids, plant viruses, contamination detection, contamination prevention, plant metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review