Supporting Whole-class Collaborative Inquiry in a Secondary Mathematics Classroom
Abstract
Recent mathematics education reform efforts call for the instantiation of mathematics classroom environments where students have opportunities to reason and construct their understandings as part of a community of learners. Despite some successes, traditional models of instruction still dominate the educational landscape. This limited success can be attributed, in part, to an underdeveloped understanding of the roles teachers must enact to successfully organize and participate in collaborative classroom practices. Toward this end, an in-depth longitudinal case study of a collaborative high school mathematics classroom was undertaken guided by the following two questions: What roles do these collaborative practices require of teacher and students? How does the community's capacity to engage in collaborative practices develop over time? The analyses produced two conceptual models: one of the teacher's role, along with specific instructional strategies the teacher used to organize a collaborative learning environment, and another of the process by which the class's capacity to participate in collaborative inquiry practices developed over time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain moves, like extending, are considered more effective in promoting student thinking.
“Among these studies, certain moves, like extending, are considered more effective in promoting student thinking (e.g., Staples 2007;Bozkus and Guner 2024).”
From Metadiscourse and Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning in Linguistics Classroom Interactions (2026) · cites this paper as Staples 2007
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039909524733 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normalizing Black Girls' Humanity in Mathematics Classrooms
JOSEPH, N. M., HAILU, M. F., & MATTHEWS, J. S. (2019) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/1943-5045-89.1.132 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Li, J., & Hu, W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12793 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Staples, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Staples, Megan
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05-24
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 161-217
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2012748075
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- collaborative inquiry, teacher role, secondary mathematics instruction, community of learners, mathematics education reform, teaching methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review