Cited by 103Innovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Mental Health InterventionsEmotion and Mood Recognition

What Does All This Data Mean for My Future Mood? Actionable Analytics and Targeted Reflection for Emotional Well-Being

Hollis, Victoria, Konrad, Artie, Springer, Aaron, Antoun, Matthew, Antoun, Christopher, Martin, Rob, Whittaker, Steve·2017·Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

We explore the Examined Life, informing the design of reflective systems to promote emotional well-being, a critical health issue. People now have increasingly rich, digital records of highly personal data about what they said, did, and felt in the past. But social science research shows that people have difficulty in tracking and regulating their emotions. New reflective technologies that promote constructive analysis of rich personal data potentially offer transformative ways that individuals might better understand themselves and improve well-being. However, there are important system design challenges in supporting effective reflection about personal data. We explore fidelity in recording and representing past personal mood data, and forecasting future actions, feelings, and thoughts. Much prior personal informatics work has been dedicated to past-centric tools for recording and capture. In contrast, forecasting examines how we might use such past data to inform and motivate our future selves, providing recommendations about remedial actions to improve future well-being. Fidelity addresses both how and what reflective systems should show people about their pasts, in particular whether we should filter negative past experiences. To inform reflective system design, we examine forecasting and fidelity in controlled field trial interventions that explore two novel system designs for presenting and reflecting on mood data. We detail findings from 165 participants, 4,693 participant logfiles, 65 surveys, and 15 user interviews. Our novel forecasting system, EmotiCal, uses past mood data to model and visualize future user moods with the goal of encouraging participants to adopt remedial new behaviors to regulate negative moods before they occur. Such forecasting both improved mood and subsequent emotional self-awareness compared with controls who simply monitored their past. Consistent with system goals, interview responses also indicated that participants generated important insights into behaviors that affect their moods. Our second intervention examined filtering; it assessed the impact on well-being of recording and revisiting past experiences containing negative emotions. We compared participants who were encouraged to record and reflect on positive versus negative experiences. Long-term measures of happiness and ruminative behaviors improved by recording and reflecting on positive but not negative experiences, although this depended on the intensity of the negative experience. We discuss general design and theory implications for future systems that support monitoring, reflection, and forecasting to facilitate productive examination of our emotional lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07370024.2016.1277724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although users generated their own data in the system, results were not directly used to inform other aspects of the user's personal behavior, so the costs of system errors were low.

    “while users generated their own data in our system, results were not directly used to inform other aspects of the user's personal behavior, as in Hollis et al. [38], so the costs of system errors were low.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 103

Authors
Hollis, V., Konrad, A., Springer, A., Antoun, M., Antoun, C., Martin, R., & Whittaker, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
32
Issue
5-6
Pages
208-267
ISSN
  • 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7051
OpenAlex
W2568165966
Cited by
103
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS- 1321102)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
examined life, emotional well-being, reflective systems, personal data, emotional self-awareness, rumination, positive and negative experiences, behavior change, happiness, personal informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review