The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description
Abstract
Dealing with questions of war and peace and understanding the causes of interstate conflict is a primary goal of the field of international relations. In order to study interstate conflict in a rigorous manner, scholars have relied on established rules and procedures for gathering information into coherent data sets. Among those data sets is the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) data. In this paper we first outline the data-collection process for the MID3 data. Second, we introduce two new data sets emerging from the project, “MID-I” and “MID-IP.” Third, we present relatively small changes in coding rules for the new MID3 data and some descriptive statistics. The statistics indicate that the MID3 data are remarkably similar to the MID2.1 version, varying in some minor and predictable ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues
Hensel, P. R., McLaughlin Mitchell, S., Sowers, T. E., & Thyne, C. L. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002707310425 · Cited by 317
When War Helps Civil–military Relations: Prolonged Interstate Conflict and the Reduced Risk of Coups
Piplani, V., & Talmadge, C. (2016) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002714567950 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosn, F., Palmer, G., & Bremer, S. A.
- Venue
- Conflict Management and Peace Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-154
- ISSN
- 0738-8942 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9219
- OpenAlex
- W2059225194
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07388940490463861
- The paper
- Ghosn, F., Palmer, G., & Bremer, S. A. (2004). The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. Conflict Management and Peace Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940490463861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
