The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Modified Version of the Cornell et al.Force Field with Improved Sugar Pucker Phases and Helical Repeat
Abstract
We have examined some subtle parameter modifications to the Cornell et al. force field, which has proven quite successful in reproducing nucleic acid properties, but whose C2'-endo sugar pucker phase and helical repeat for B DNA appear to be somewhat underestimated. Encouragingly, the addition of a single V2 term involving the atoms C(sp3)-O-(sp3)-C(sp3)-N(sp2), which can be nicely rationalized because of the anomeric effect (lone pairs on oxygen are preferentially oriented relative to the electron withdrawing N), brings the sugar pucker phase of C2'-endo sugars to near perfect agreement with ab initio calculations (W near 162 degrees). Secondly, the use of high level ab initio calculations on entire nucleosides (in contrast to smaller model systems necessitated in 1994-95 by computer limitations) lets one improve the chi torsional potential for nucleic acids. Finally, the O(sp3)-C(sp3)- C(sp3)-O(sp3) V2 torsional potential has been empirically adjusted to reproduce the ab initio calculated relative energy of C2'-endo and C3'-endo nucleosides. These modifications are tested in molecular dynamics simulations of mononucleosides (to assess sugar pucker percentages) and double helices of DNA and RNA (to assess helical and sequence specific structural properties). In both areas, the modified force field leads to improved agreement with experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mackerell, A. D., Feig, M., & Brooks, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20065 · Cited by 3,319
Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids
MacKerell, A. D., Banavali, N., & Foloppe, N. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:4<257::aid-bip10029>3.0.co;2-w · Cited by 1,077
Hart, K., Foloppe, N., Baker, C. M., Denning, E. J., Nilsson, L., & MacKerell, A. D. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200723y · Cited by 578
Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA
Galindo-Murillo, R., Robertson, J. C., Zgarbová, M., Šponer, J., Otyepka, M., Jurečka, P., & Cheatham, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00186 · Cited by 527
Self-citationKnotts, T. A., Rathore, N., Schwartz, D. C., & de Pablo, J. J. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2431804 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheatham, T. E., Cieplak, P., & Kollman, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 845-862
- ISSN
- 0739-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-0254
- OpenAlex
- W2091765441
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modified Version of the Cornell et al.Force Field with Improved Sugar Pucker Phases and Helical Repeat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07391102.1999.10508297
- The paper
- Cheatham, T. E., Cieplak, P., & Kollman, P. A. (1999). A Modified Version of the Cornell et al.Force Field with Improved Sugar Pucker Phases and Helical Repeat. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.1999.10508297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.