Cited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Human Cystatin C and Its L68Q Varient to Investigate the Domain Swapping Mechanism

Liu, Hsuan-Liang, Lin, Yuan-Min, Zhao, Jian-Hua, Hsieh, Man-Ching, Lin, Hsin-Yi, Huang, Chih-Hung, Fang, Hsu-Wei, Ho, Yih +1 more·2007·Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics

Abstract

Human cystatin C variant (L68Q), one of the amyloidgenic proteins, has been shown to form dimeric structure spontaneously via domain swapping and easily cause amyloid deposits in the brains of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease or hereditary cystatin C amyloid angiopathy. The monomeric L68Q and wild-type (wt) HCCs share similar structural feature consisting of a core with a five-stranded anti-parallel beta-sheet (beta-region) wrapped around a central helix. In this study, various molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to investigate the conformational fluctuations of the monomeric L68Q and wt HCCs at various combinations of temperature (300 and 500K) and pH (2 and 7) to gain insights into the domain swapping mechanism. The results show that elevated temperature accelerates the disruption of the hydrophobic core and acidic condition promotes the destruction of three salt bridges between beta2 and beta3 in both HCCs. The results also indicate that the interior hydrophobic core of the L68Q variant is relatively unstable, leading to domain swapping more readily comparing to wt HCC under conditions favoring this process. However, these two monomeric HCCs adopt the same mechanism of domain swapping as follows: (i) first, the interior hydrophobic core is disrupted; (ii) subsequently, the central helix departs from the beta-region; (iii) then, the beta2-L1-beta3 hairpin structure unfolds following the so-called "zip-up" mechanism; and (iv) finally, the open form HCC i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07391102.2007.10507162

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H.-L., Lin, Y.-M., Zhao, J.-H., Hsieh, M.-C., Lin, H.-Y., Huang, C.-H., Fang, H.-W., Ho, Y., & Chen, W.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Taipei University of Technology (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • National Central University (TW)
Venue
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
Published
2007-10
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
135-144
ISSN
  • 0739-1102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0254
OpenAlex
W2145814596
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Keywords
domain swapping, amyloidogenic proteins, amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer's disease, salt bridges, conformational fluctuations, temperature effects, pH effect
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Cystatins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Structure, Quaternary, Cystatin C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review