Cited by 14Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild Abuse and Trauma

Effect of Intimate Partner Violence on Antenatal Functional Health Status of Childbearing Women in Northeastern Thailand

Open access
Saito, Amornrat, Creedy, Debra, Cooke, Marie, Chaboyer, Wendy·2013·Health Care for Women International

Abstract

We investigated the effects of physical, psychological, and sexual violence on the health status of women attending antenatal clinics at two tertiary hospitals in rural Thailand. We asked 421 pregnant women at 32 weeks gestation or later to complete a survey questionnaire. Participants reported high rates of psychological abuse (53.7%); threats, acts of physical abuse, or both (26.6%); and sexual violence (19.2%). Women abused during pregnancy had poorer health compared with nonabused women, in role emotional functioning, vitality, bodily pain, mental health, and social functioning. Given the high prevalence of violence and poor health status, routine screenings by maternity services is urgently required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07399332.2013.794459

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most prior studies show a positive association between any kind of violence and all chronic conditions, with a significant difference between abused and not-abused women.

    “Most of these studies show a positive association between any kind of violence and all chronic conditions, with a significant difference between the group of abused women and the group of not-abused women [38–44].”

    From The association between violence against women and chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Functional health status section (page unavailable) reports significant differences between abused and non-abused pregnant women in four health-status measures. It says differences in the remaining measures were not statistically significant, and the study did not test an association with all chronic conditions. The Abstract discusses several chronic health problems reported in prior research, but does not establish the claim's across-the-board association. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Archavanitkul, K. (1999). Violence against women: Danger in the silence, dark, light and every aspect of women's lives. In: K. Archavanitkul & P. Boonmongkon (Eds.). Reconstructing the Concept of Women and Health (pp. 487-544). Bangkok: Genderplace.
  2. Junsri, S., Sriherunwong, A.. & Pornchaikate -Aeu Yong, A. (2009). The development of a clinical practice guideline using an advocacy program in Thai battered women. Thai Journal of Nursing Council, 24(4), 19-28 (in Thai).
  3. McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Soeken, K., & Bullock, L. (1992). Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA, 267(23), 3176-3179.
  4. McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Soeken, K., Silva, C., & Reed, S. (1999). Severity of abuse before and during pregnancy for African American, Hispanic, and Anglo women. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 44, 139-144.
  5. Parker, B., McFarlane, J., & Soeken, K. (1994). Abuse during pregnancy: Effects on maternal complications and birth weight in adult and teenage women. Obstetric & Gynecology, 84(3), 323-328.
  6. Quicker, J.C. (2002). Thailand. In R. Summers & A. Hoffman (Eds.), Domestic Violence: A Global View (pp. 156-166). Westport: Greenwood Press.
  7. Weinbaum, Z., Stratton, T.L., Chavez, G., Mohlewski-Link, C., Barrera, N., & Courtney, J. (2001). Female victims of intimate partner physical domestic violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21, 313-319.

Authors
Saito, A., Creedy, D., Cooke, M., & Chaboyer, W.
Affiliations
  • Khon Kaen University (TH)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Health Care for Women International
Published
2013-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
757-774
ISSN
  • 0739-9332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4665
OpenAlex
W2089024337
Cited by
14
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Care For Women International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, prenatal care, pregnant women, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual violence, functional status, emotional functioning, vitality, bodily pain, mental health, social functioning, violence screening, rural Thailand
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Maternal-Child Health Centers, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Sexual Partners, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, Thailand, Prevalence, Pregnant People, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review