Examining Prosecutorial Discretion in Federal Criminal Cases: Legal and Extra-Legal Determinants of Declination and Charge Change Decisions
Abstract
From 2000 to 2010, the federal criminal caseload increased roughly 50% with a large portion of this increase attributed to the rise in immigration prosecutions. These changes coupled with recent Supreme Court decisions rendering the guidelines advisory have renewed calls for research examining prosecutorial discretion, particularly with respect to the influence of legal and extralegal factors on charging and bargaining decisions. This study utilizes data (2002–2010) from the Federal Justice Statistics Program database housed within the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD). More specifically, the current research examines prosecutorial decisions to decline to charge federal arrestees and to make any changes to the charge from the arresting offense. Results from the multilevel, multivariate models reveal that both extra-legal and legal factors were influential of these decisions. Disaggregated models also revealed considerable variation across different offense types. Finally, districts with higher caseloads had lower odds of a prosecutorial declination and charge change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The size of a US District Court's caseload can have a significant impact on case processing and outcomes.
“The size of a USDC's caseload can have a significant impact on case processing and outcomes, with some courts handling only a few thousand criminal cases per year, while others handle over 130,000 cases annually (Hartley and Tillyer, 2018).”
From US Attorney Declination Rates of Tribal Cases: Resources Matter! (2025) · cites this paper as Hartley and Tillyer, 2018
Cites
Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives.
Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499234 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Ulmer, J. T. (2005) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2005.28.2.255 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
US Attorney Declination Rates of Tribal Cases: Resources Matter!
Branton, R. (2025) · The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2025.34
- Authors
- Hartley, R. D., & Tillyer, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hartley, Richard D.
- Venue
- Justice Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-11-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1195-1225
- ISSN
- 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2907749503
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Justice
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- prosecutorial discretion, federal criminal cases, plea bargaining, prosecutorial decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review