Cited by 37Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsCriminal Law and Policy

Examining Prosecutorial Discretion in Federal Criminal Cases: Legal and Extra-Legal Determinants of Declination and Charge Change Decisions

Hartley, Richard D., Tillyer, Rob·2018·Justice Quarterly

Abstract

From 2000 to 2010, the federal criminal caseload increased roughly 50% with a large portion of this increase attributed to the rise in immigration prosecutions. These changes coupled with recent Supreme Court decisions rendering the guidelines advisory have renewed calls for research examining prosecutorial discretion, particularly with respect to the influence of legal and extralegal factors on charging and bargaining decisions. This study utilizes data (2002–2010) from the Federal Justice Statistics Program database housed within the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD). More specifically, the current research examines prosecutorial decisions to decline to charge federal arrestees and to make any changes to the charge from the arresting offense. Results from the multilevel, multivariate models reveal that both extra-legal and legal factors were influential of these decisions. Disaggregated models also revealed considerable variation across different offense types. Finally, districts with higher caseloads had lower odds of a prosecutorial declination and charge change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07418825.2018.1530367

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The size of a US District Court's caseload can have a significant impact on case processing and outcomes.

    “The size of a USDC's caseload can have a significant impact on case processing and outcomes, with some courts handling only a few thousand criminal cases per year, while others handle over 130,000 cases annually (Hartley and Tillyer, 2018).”

    From US Attorney Declination Rates of Tribal Cases: Resources Matter! (2025) · cites this paper as Hartley and Tillyer, 2018

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartley, R. D., & Tillyer, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Hartley, Richard D.
Venue
Justice Quarterly
Published
2018-11-10
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1195-1225
ISSN
  • 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9109
OpenAlex
W2907749503
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Justice
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
prosecutorial discretion, federal criminal cases, plea bargaining, prosecutorial decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review