Cited by 347Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship

Brandl, Steven G., Frank, James, Worden, Robert E., Bynum, Timothy S.·1994·Justice Quarterly

Abstract

Since the 1960s, a substantial body of research has focused on citizens' attitudes toward the police. These studies tap a rather wide variety of outlooks: some ask about specific assessments of the police (e.g., satisfaction with the police in particular incidents), while others ask about more global assessments (e.g., satisfaction with the police in general, police in the community, or police in the neighborhood). Using data obtained through a panel survey of 398 residents of a large midwestern city, we compare specific assessments of police performance with more global attitudes toward the police. We also examine the effects of global and specific attitudes on one another. The results show that the two measures produce similar levels of support for the police. The results reveal further that global attitudes have substantial effects on specific assessments of police performance, and that the effects of specific assessments of police performance on global attitudes are modest by comparison.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07418829400092161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attitudes toward the police correlate with citizens' subjective experiences with the police in individual contacts, both voluntary contacts and involuntary contacts.

    “Attitudes toward the police also correlate with citizens' subjective experiences with the police in individual contacts, both voluntary contacts—when citizens report crimes or request assistance—and involuntary contacts—when they are stopped by the police.”

    From Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy (2017) · cites this paper as Brandl et al. 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 347

Authors
Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., & Bynum, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Justice Quarterly
Published
1994-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
119-134
ISSN
  • 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9109
OpenAlex
W2053515586
Cited by
347
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
25.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
attitudes toward police, police satisfaction, police performance, police-community relations, police support, neighbourhood policing, police-citizen relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review