Cited by 1,906Team Dynamics and PerformanceKnowledge Management and SharingSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams

Open access
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L., Knoll, Kathleen, Leidner, Dorothy E.·1998·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

:A global virtual team is an example of a boundaryless network organization form where a temporary team is assembled on an as-needed basis for the duration of a task and staffed by members from different countries. In such teams, coordination is accomplished via trust and shared communication systems. The focus of the reported study was to explore the antecedents of trust in a global virtual-team setting. Seventy-five teams, consisting of four to six members residing in different countries, interacted and worked together for eight weeks. The two-week trust-building exercises did have a significant effect on the team members’ perceptions of the other members’ ability, integrity, and benevolence. In the early phases of teamwork, team trust was predicted strongest by perceptions of other team members’ integrity, and weakest by perceptions of their benevolence. The effect of other members’ perceived ability on trust decreased over time. The members’ own propensity to trust had a significant, though unchanging, effect on trust. A qualitative analysis of six teams’ electronic mail messages explored strategies that were used by the three highest trust teams, but were used infrequently or not at all by the three lowest trust teams. The strategies suggest the presence of “swift” trust. The paper advances a research model for explaining trust in global virtual teams.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 1,906

Authors
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
1998-03
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
29-64
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W1961867604
Cited by
1,906
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 127
FWCI
40.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
trust, global virtual teams, antecedents of trust, boundaryless organization, multicultural teams, perceived integrity, perceived benevolence, perceived competence, trust propensity, swift trust, temporary teams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review